已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Cost comparison of four venous catheters: Short peripheral catheter, Long peripheral line, Midline, and PICC for peripheral infusion

外围设备 医学 导管 外科 内科学
作者
E Meto,E. Cabout,Hervé Rosay,F. Espinasse,Anne-Sophie Lot,Mostafa El Hajjam,Sabine Gnamien Clermont,R Launois
出处
期刊:Journal of Vascular Access [SAGE Publishing]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1177/11297298241258257
摘要

Introduction: The use of midline catheters for patients requiring a peripheral IV infusion is sometimes limited by their cost. Although decision trees allow them to be positioned in relation to short peripheral cannulas (SPC), Midlines, and PICCs, their economic impact has not yet been evaluated. A study was conducted to estimate and compare the actual costs of using the three types of catheters for durations of 7, 14, and 21 days. Methods: A budget impact analysis compared midlines or mini-midlines/long peripheral cannulas (LPCs) with SPCs and PICCs for typical medical indications excluding indications requiring central line (infusion of irritant or vesicant drugs): treatment of peritonitis over 7 days, cystic fibrosis infection over 14 days, and meningitis over 21 days. A micro-costing study identified resources used during catheter care procedures (consumables, medical/nursing care, examinations, mechanical complications). The cost of remote systemic complications was estimated from the French national cost study. Literature review compared data based on published complication frequencies. Results: Midline is more economic than the SPC (saving of 39€ over 7 days and 174€ over 14 days), and than the PICC (saving of 102€ over 14 days and 95€ over 21 days). Discussion: Despite a much higher acquisition cost of the Midline than a SPC, the cost of using a Midline is lower. Although this approach cannot be the only argument for choosing a medical device, it can contribute to it in a tense economic context. The micro-costing has been performed in a center placing PICCline using fluoroscopy for catheter tip positioning. The implantation of a PICC with ECG technique does not require an interventional radiology facility and involves significantly lower logistical and personnel costs. This factor is a limitation in this study. However, even with the use of EGC, the cost difference is in favor of Midline.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
潇洒夏山发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
4秒前
潇洒夏山完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
林一完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
ldgsd完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
大碗完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
龙仔完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
krathhong完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
星辰大海应助潇洒夏山采纳,获得10
15秒前
关天木发布了新的文献求助30
15秒前
在水一方应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
19秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
20秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
爱喝佳得乐完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
英俊的铭应助Woo_SH采纳,获得10
28秒前
AAA完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
善学以致用应助CGBIO采纳,获得10
30秒前
lrl发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
乐乐应助yy123采纳,获得10
32秒前
李健的小迷弟应助WFLLL采纳,获得10
33秒前
dennisysz发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
594zqz完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
45秒前
46秒前
49秒前
毛毛发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
54秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
在水一方应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
59秒前
xcc完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
共享精神应助毛毛采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
lrl完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3777470
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3322842
关于积分的说明 10212001
捐赠科研通 3038215
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1667213
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798010
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758147