Cost comparison of four venous catheters: Short peripheral catheter, Long peripheral line, Midline, and PICC for peripheral infusion

外围设备 医学 导管 外科 内科学
作者
E Meto,E. Cabout,Hervé Rosay,F. Espinasse,Anne-Sophie Lot,Mostafa El Hajjam,Sabine Gnamien Clermont,R Launois
出处
期刊:Journal of Vascular Access [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:26 (3): 966-974 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1177/11297298241258257
摘要

INTRODUCTION: The use of midline catheters for patients requiring a peripheral IV infusion is sometimes limited by their cost. Although decision trees allow them to be positioned in relation to short peripheral cannulas (SPC), Midlines, and PICCs, their economic impact has not yet been evaluated. A study was conducted to estimate and compare the actual costs of using the three types of catheters for durations of 7, 14, and 21 days. METHODS: A budget impact analysis compared midlines or mini-midlines/long peripheral cannulas (LPCs) with SPCs and PICCs for typical medical indications excluding indications requiring central line (infusion of irritant or vesicant drugs): treatment of peritonitis over 7 days, cystic fibrosis infection over 14 days, and meningitis over 21 days. A micro-costing study identified resources used during catheter care procedures (consumables, medical/nursing care, examinations, mechanical complications). The cost of remote systemic complications was estimated from the French national cost study. Literature review compared data based on published complication frequencies. RESULTS: Midline is more economic than the SPC (saving of 39€ over 7 days and 174€ over 14 days), and than the PICC (saving of 102€ over 14 days and 95€ over 21 days). DISCUSSION: Despite a much higher acquisition cost of the Midline than a SPC, the cost of using a Midline is lower. Although this approach cannot be the only argument for choosing a medical device, it can contribute to it in a tense economic context. The micro-costing has been performed in a center placing PICCline using fluoroscopy for catheter tip positioning. The implantation of a PICC with ECG technique does not require an interventional radiology facility and involves significantly lower logistical and personnel costs. This factor is a limitation in this study. However, even with the use of EGC, the cost difference is in favor of Midline.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Hello应助幸福雪糕采纳,获得10
刚刚
上好佳完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
阿涛发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
SciGPT应助efgvv采纳,获得10
2秒前
LYR完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
负数发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
口腔飞飞完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
彩色淼淼发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研通AI6.4应助proton采纳,获得10
6秒前
清风发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
ant完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
嘟嘟庞发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Autumn完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
赘婿应助majm采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
Dragonfln完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
传奇3应助澜生采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
沉稳完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
黄寒梅发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
sanlang完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
元首完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
爆米花应助小小杜采纳,获得10
12秒前
庞儿发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
猪猪发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
幸福雪糕发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
kkscanl完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
香蕉觅云应助尔尔采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助涞涞采纳,获得10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
化工安全与环保 1000
Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems 1000
基于锂离子电池正极材料回收的绿色溶剂开发及工程化应用研究 800
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 600
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7652825
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9224077
关于积分的说明 19811922
捐赠科研通 7218672
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3279046
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2439738
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2278209