漏斗图
接收机工作特性
荟萃分析
出版偏见
注意缺陷多动障碍
心理学
人工智能
听力学
医学
机器学习
临床心理学
计算机科学
病理
作者
Lu Tian,Helin Zheng,Ke Zhang,Jiawen Qiu,Xuejuan Song,Siwei Li,Zhao Zeng,Baosheng Ran,Xin Deng,Jinhua Cai
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.111
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of ML techniques based on sMRI or/and fMRI for ADHD. We conducted a comprehensive search (from database creation date to March 2024) for relevant English articles on sMRI or/and fMRI-based ML techniques for diagnosing ADHD. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of sMRI or/and fMRI-based ML techniques. The I2 test was used to assess heterogeneity and the source of heterogeneity was investigated by performing a meta-regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed using the Deeks funnel plot asymmetry test. Forty-three studies were included in the systematic review, 27 of which were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of sMRI or/and fMRI-based ML techniques for the diagnosis of ADHD were 0.74 (95 % CI 0.65–0.81) and 0.75 (95 % CI 0.67–0.81), respectively. SROC curve showed that AUC was 0.81 (95 % CI 0.77–0.84). Based on these findings, the sMRI or/and fMRI-based ML techniques have relatively good diagnostic value for ADHD. Our meta-analysis specifically focused on ML techniques based on sMRI or/and fMRI studies. Since EEG-based ML techniques are also used for diagnosing ADHD, further systematic analyses are necessary to explore ML methods based on multimodal medical data. sMRI or/and fMRI-based ML technique is a promising objective diagnostic method for ADHD.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI