食品安全
风险评估
欧洲联盟
业务
风险管理
趋同(经济学)
会计
钥匙(锁)
风险分析(工程)
风格(视觉艺术)
奖学金
营销
政治学
经济
财务
管理
法学
计算机科学
国际贸易
医学
经济增长
计算机安全
病理
考古
历史
作者
Olivier Borraz,Anne‐Laure Beaussier,Mara Wesseling,David Demeritt,Henry Rothstein,Marijke Hermans,Michael Huber,Regine Paul
摘要
Abstract This article advances scholarship on comparative regulation by moving beyond the conventional focus on formal law and EU comitology to assess the extent of ‘practice convergence’ in the implementation of EU regulation. Drawing on 50 key informant interviews, a survey, and policy document analysis, we compare how regulators in England, Germany, France and the Netherlands have implemented EU requirements that food safety inspections be ‘risk‐based’. Focusing on a clear dependent variable – risk‐scoring methods – we find important differences in the conception and targeting of risk‐based inspections; with starkly different implications for what kind of food businesses they need to target to ensure safety within an ostensibly harmonized single market. We attribute variation in the implementation of risk‐based inspection to the ways that EU requirements were filtered through long‐entrenched regulatory styles and modes of food business organization in each country, reinforcing preexisting inspection practices in the design of new risk‐based tools.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI