卡托普利
医学
地高辛
心力衰竭
内科学
心脏病学
多中心研究
随机对照试验
血压
作者
Jay N. Cohn,Morton Hawkins,Herbert J. Levine,John Naughton,Elliot Rapaport,Sidney Goldstein,Bertram Pitt,Robert Cody,Prakash Deedwania,Leonard G. Dennick,Joseph A. Franciosa,Mark E. McGovern,Joseph H. Meyer,Alan H. Gradman,Barry M. Massie,Milton Packer,James E. Doherty,Jacquelyn Gammill,William H. Cooper,Stanford Engel
出处
期刊:JAMA
[American Medical Association]
日期:1988-01-22
卷期号:259 (4): 539-544
被引量:126
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.259.4.539
摘要
This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compares the effects of captopril treatment with those of digoxin treatment during maintenance diuretic therapy in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Compared with placebo, captopril therapy resulted in significantly improved exercise time (mean increase, 82 s vs 35 s) and improved New York Heart Association class (41% vs 22%), but digoxin therapy did not. Digoxin treatment increased ejection fraction (4.4% increase) compared with captopril therapy (1.8% increase) and placebo (0.9% increase). The number of ventricular premature beats decreased 45% in the captopril group and increased 4% in the digoxin group in patients with more than ten ventricular premature beats per hour. Treatment failures, increased requirements for diuretic therapy, and hospitalizations were significantly more frequent in patients receiving placebo compared with those receiving either active drug. Transitory hypotension occurred more frequently with administration of captopril. Captopril treatment is significantly more effective than placebo and is an alternative to digoxin therapy in patients with mild to moderate heart failure who are receiving diuretic maintenance therapy. (JAMA1988;259:539-544)
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI