Screening tests for aphasia in patients with stroke: a systematic review

失语症 致盲 冲程(发动机) 医学 考试(生物学) 神经学 荟萃分析 物理疗法 梅德林 随机对照试验 精神科 外科 内科学 政治学 机械工程 生物 工程类 古生物学 法学
作者
Hanane El Hachioui,Evy Visch‐Brink,Lonneke M.L. de Lau,Mieke W.M.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman,Femke Nouwens,Peter J. Koudstaal,Diederik W.J. Dippel
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurology [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:264 (2): 211-220 被引量:87
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00415-016-8170-8
摘要

Aphasia has a large impact on the quality of life and adds significantly to the costs of stroke care. Early recognition of aphasia in stroke patients is important for prognostication and well-timed treatment planning. We aimed to identify available screening tests for differentiating between aphasic and non-aphasic stroke patients, and to evaluate test accuracy, reliability, and feasibility. We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO for published studies on screening tests aimed at assessing aphasia in stroke patients. The reference lists of the selected articles were scanned, and several experts were contacted to detect additional references. Of each screening test, we estimated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio of a positive test, likelihood ratio of a negative test, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and rated the degree of bias of the validation method. We included ten studies evaluating eight screening tests. There was a large variation across studies regarding sample size, patient characteristics, and reference tests used for validation. Many papers failed to report on the consecutiveness of patient inclusion, time between aphasia onset and administration of the screening test, and blinding. Of the three studies that were rated as having an intermediate or low risk of bias, the DOR was highest for the Language Screening Test and ScreeLing. Several screening tools for aphasia in stroke are available, but many tests have not been verified properly. Methodologically sound validation studies of aphasia screening tests are needed to determine their usefulness in clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
刘艺娜发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Hello应助雨慧采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
YY应助刻苦如豹采纳,获得10
6秒前
传统的斓完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
Huuu完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
mumu完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助Wayne采纳,获得10
11秒前
震动的坤完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
OnionJJ驳回了WLWLW应助
13秒前
15秒前
chang完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
汉堡包应助LU采纳,获得10
16秒前
执着烧鹅完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
震动的坤发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
23秒前
23秒前
小蘑菇应助我的路采纳,获得10
24秒前
小白科研完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
26秒前
科研女工发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
yyyyds发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
小蘑菇应助纸飞机采纳,获得10
29秒前
ACMI发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
xxx发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
黄黄完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
DD发布了新的文献求助30
32秒前
NexusExplorer应助MG_XSJ采纳,获得10
33秒前
ckz发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
35秒前
yyyyds完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
xiaomei51发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
37秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
高分求助中
【请各位用户详细阅读此贴后再求助】科研通的精品贴汇总(请勿应助) 10000
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Research on Disturbance Rejection Control Algorithm for Aerial Operation Robots 1000
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4044663
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3582522
关于积分的说明 11386753
捐赠科研通 3309343
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1821635
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 893858
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815875