期刊:Oxford University Press eBooks [Oxford University Press] 日期:2011-06-30卷期号:: 95-129
标识
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606177.003.0003
摘要
Pleasure and its opposite, pain or distaste, are not sensation-like inner states. As Ryle argued, pleasure can be understood via the notion of enjoyment. The idea that pleasure is good, or a good, seems related to the fact that ‘For pleasure’ often supplies a desirability characterization. But this fact looks puzzling, given the affinity between enjoying and wanting: how can ‘I enjoy it’ be an adequate answer to ‘Why do you want to do that?’? The solution relates to the possibility of giving a rationale, i.e. an answer to ‘How is that pleasant?’ Not anything can intelligibly be called pleasant. Pleasure, like desire, falls within the space of reasons. But the distinction between reason and cause can be blurred, e.g. in the case of humour. Deep pleasures can improve or broaden, music being a notable example.