医学
心脏再同步化治疗
心脏病学
左束支阻滞
内科学
射血分数
心力衰竭
QRS波群
临床终点
室性心动过速
植入式心律转复除颤器
危险系数
心室颤动
窦性心律
心房颤动
随机对照试验
置信区间
作者
Wojciech Zaręba,Helmut Klein,Iwona Cygankiewicz,William J. Hall,Scott McNitt,Mary W. Brown,David S. Cannom,James P. Daubert,Michael Eldar,Michael R. Gold,Jeffrey J. Goldberger,Ilan Goldenberg,Edgar Lichstein,Heinz F. Pitschner,Mayer Rashtian,Scott D. Solomon,Sami Viskin,Paul J. Wang,Arthur J. Moss
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2011-03-01
卷期号:123 (10): 1061-1072
被引量:827
标识
DOI:10.1161/circulationaha.110.960898
摘要
Background— This study aimed to determine whether QRS morphology identifies patients who benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) and whether it influences the risk of primary and secondary end points in patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Methods and Results— Baseline 12-lead ECGs were evaluated with regard to QRS morphology. Heart failure event or death was the primary end point of the trial. Death, heart failure event, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation were secondary end points. Among 1817 patients with available sinus rhythm ECGs at baseline, there were 1281 (70%) with left bundle-branch block (LBBB), 228 (13%) with right bundle-branch block, and 308 (17%) with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbances. The latter 2 groups were defined as non-LBBB groups. Hazard ratios for the primary end point for comparisons of CRT-D patients versus patients who only received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were significantly ( P <0.001) lower in LBBB patients (0.47; P <0.001) than in non-LBBB patients (1.24; P =0.257). The risk of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or death was decreased significantly in CRT-D patients with LBBB but not in non-LBBB patients. Echocardiographic parameters showed significantly ( P <0.001) greater reduction in left ventricular volumes and increase in ejection fraction with CRT-D in LBBB than in non-LBBB patients. Conclusions— Heart failure patients with New York Heart Association class I or II and ejection fraction ≤30% and LBBB derive substantial clinical benefit from CRT-D: a reduction in heart failure progression and a reduction in the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. No clinical benefit was observed in patients with a non-LBBB QRS pattern (right bundle-branch block or intraventricular conduction disturbances). Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00180271.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI