Family health conversations versus support group conversations when a family member has been critically ill: A mixed methods study.

Introduction: When a family member has been critically ill and cared for at an intensive care unit the individual family member as well as the family system are affected and in need of support.The aim of this study was to compare and contrast the responses from two different types of follow-up interventions for families of critically ill persons, focusing on individual hopes, health-related quality of life, family functioning and ability to cope with challenges.Methods: Adult family members from three hospitals attended one of two interventions two months after intensive care.The family health conversation included the family.The support group conversation included just family members and not the patient who had experienced intensive care.Data were collected via self-reported questionnaires and follow-up interviews with family members.Quantitative and qualitative data were first analyzed separately, and the results were then integrated through mixed methods analysis.Results: A total of 38 family members took part in the interventions.Family members in the two intervention groups talked about how they had more hope for the future, and about how talking within the family and the group had helped them justify their feelings, which empowered them in the transition toward a healthier quality of life.Comparisons of the interventions show a higher significance of family function and hope in the family health conversation.Discussion: The article illustrates a disparity between how family members function and the needs they have for follow-up.We discuss what kind of follow-up these persons need.