Qualitative Analysis of the Treatment Experience and Well-Being of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Enrolled in 2 Trials of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) during the Initial Stages of Therapy

医学 定性研究 临床试验 白细胞清除术 汽车T细胞治疗 内科学 家庭医学 肿瘤科 嵌合抗原受体 癌症 生物 社会学 遗传学 社会科学 干细胞 免疫疗法 川地34
作者
Tanya Siddiqi,Ulrich Jaeger,Olga Moshkovich,Jennifer Devlen,Matthew Miera,Agnes Williams,Jens Hasskarl,Fei‐Fei Liu,Julia Braverman,Gilles Salles
出处
期刊:Blood [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:136 (Supplement 1): 22-23
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood-2020-137656
摘要

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel treatment modality for patients with R/R LBCL. Limited information exists regarding patients' views of CAR T cell therapy. Our research aimed to better understand patients' needs by capturing their expectations/concerns, current well-being, and treatment experiences during the beginning stages of CAR T cell therapy in the clinical trial setting. Methods: Patients with R/R LBCL from 2 ongoing trials of the investigational, CD19-directed CAR T cell therapy liso-cel (TRANSCEND WORLD [NCT03484702] or PLATFORM [NCT03310619]) were invited to participate in an optional interview component. Semistructured interviews were conducted to gain insight about patients' experience with CAR T cell therapy in the clinical trials. Interviews of ≤1 hour (in-person or over the phone) were conducted in parallel with screening procedures (interview 1), after leukapheresis (interview 2), and up to 3 days after liso-cel infusion (interview 3). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. MAXQDA (VERBI GmbH, Berlin, Germany) qualitative analysis software was used to manage and thematically organize interview transcript data to identify key concepts related to each research objective. Previously reported results of interview 1 showed a high perception of unmet needs, lack of alternative options, and expectations for positive outcomes. The analysis presented here primarily focused on interviews 2 and 3. Denominators shown in the Results vary by question as some patients skipped questions. Results: A total of 75 interviews were analyzed, including 35, 24, and 16 patients at interviews 1, 2, and 3, respectively, across sites in the US (n = 14), Europe (n = 26), and Japan (n = 2). Among 42 patients who completed ≥1 interview, the mean age was 62 years and 69% were male. Treatment Experience: Of 24 patients who completed interview 2, 22 (92%) reported positive experiences during leukapheresis and 16 (67%) reported the procedure was as expected. Patients thought the most difficult part of leukapheresis was the length of the procedure (n = 8/21 [38%]). Of 15 patients who provided feedback on lymphodepleting chemotherapy, a majority reported that it was as expected (n = 8 [53%]) or easier than expected (n = 3 [20%]); when asked about the most difficult part, many patients (n = 7/17 [41%]) discussed side effects (eg, nausea, fatigue, and lack of appetite). Of patients who described liso-cel infusion as different than expected, differences included easier (n = 12/13 [92%]) or quicker (n = 3/12 [25%]) than expected, and 5/12 (42%) reported few/no side effects within 3 days post-infusion. Over half of patients (n = 8/14 [57%]) reported that the infusion, as a whole, was not difficult. Changes over Time: At interviews 1, 2, and 3, respectively, 47% (n = 14/30), 47% (n = 9/19), and 69% (n = 9/13) of patients reported hoping for successful treatment. Similarly, patients generally had fewer concerns later in the process, with 21 (64%) and 11 (33%) of 33 patients reporting side-effect and treatment efficacy concerns, respectively, during interview 1 vs 5 (33%) and 3 (20%) of 15 patients, respectively, during interview 3. At time of enrollment, most patients (n = 21/34 [62%]) were able to function normally or with minimal impact from their lymphoma, although most reported some symptoms like fatigue, pain, or stomach problems. At interview 1, 14 (40%) of 35 patients were employed; most patients reported no changes in their work life at interviews 2 (n = 19/20 [95%]) and 3 (n = 11/12 [92%]). From enrollment to immediately post-infusion, the physical health of most patients remained stable (n = 4/16 [25%]) or deteriorated (n = 9/16 [56%]). However, most patients (n = 14/15 [93%]) reported feeling positive at interview 3. Conclusions: This study provided the unique opportunity to gather feedback directly from patients participating in clinical trials of liso-cel therapy, specifically during the initial treatment stages. The overall impression of the treatment was positive, with most patients reporting that study procedures were easier than expected. The results of this qualitative research provide useful insight into the motivations, expectations, and experiences of patients with R/R LBCL receiving liso-cel therapy, which can inform the design of health care support systems and future clinical trials to better meet patients' needs. Disclosures Siddiqi: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncternal: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Jaeger:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; CDR Life AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Moshkovich:Icon Plc: Current Employment. Devlen:Icon Plc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Miera:Icon Plc: Current Employment. Williams:Icon Plc: Current Employment. Hasskarl:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liu:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Braverman:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Salles:MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Debiopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Epizyme: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Autolus: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI2S应助傲娇刚采纳,获得10
刚刚
wzx完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
阿海的发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
mlle完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
吼吼哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
123455完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
海绵宝宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
叫我益达完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
PRUNUS完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
完美世界应助研究僧采纳,获得10
5秒前
玛玛哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
研友_LJGXgn完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
KiLu_A发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
自信的丸子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
Ti发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
李爱国应助高兴藏花采纳,获得10
8秒前
闪闪的冬天完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
Akim应助lucia采纳,获得30
8秒前
aaaa完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
好汉完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
曾建完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
zhenya完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
香蕉觅云应助无奈书蝶采纳,获得10
10秒前
雨诺完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
口腔溃杨完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
梧桐完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
快乐二方完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
任性的咖啡完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
少三点完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
jaytotti发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
lzy完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】请使用合适的网盘上传文件 10000
The Oxford Encyclopedia of the History of Modern Psychology 1500
Green Star Japan: Esperanto and the International Language Question, 1880–1945 800
Sentimental Republic: Chinese Intellectuals and the Maoist Past 800
The Martian climate revisited: atmosphere and environment of a desert planet 800
Parametric Random Vibration 800
城市流域产汇流机理及其驱动要素研究—以北京市为例 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3860476
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3402715
关于积分的说明 10630698
捐赠科研通 3125539
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1723637
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 830091
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 778801