去骨瓣减压术
医学
格拉斯哥结局量表
创伤性脑损伤
格拉斯哥昏迷指数
神经外科
减压
外科
随机对照试验
死亡率
精神科
作者
Syed Muhammad Maroof Hashmi,Sadaf Nazir,Francesca Colombo,Akmal Jamil,Shahid Ahmed
出处
期刊:Asian journal of neurosurgery
[Medknow Publications]
日期:2022-09-01
卷期号:17 (03): 455-462
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1756636
摘要
Abstract Background Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading public health problems across the world. TBI is associated with high economic costs to the healthcare system specially in developing countries. Decompressive craniectomy is a procedure in which an area of the skull is removed to increase the volume of intracranial compartment. There are various techniques of decompressive craniectomy used that include subtemporal and circular decompression, and unilateral or bilateral frontotemporoparietal decompression. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of decompressive craniectomy for the management of severe TBI versus conservative management alone at the Department of Neurosurgery, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Methods The study (randomized controlled trial) was conducted from February 1, 2014, till June 30, 2017. Results A total of 136 patients were included after following the inclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned to two groups, making it 68 patients in each study group. There were 89 males and 47 females. All the patients received standard care recommended by the Brain Trauma Foundation. The mortality rate observed at 6 months in decompressive craniectomy was 22.05%, while among conservative management group, it was 45.58%. Difference in mortality of both groups at 6 months was significant. Total 61.76% (42) of patients from decompressive craniectomy group had a favorable outcome (Glasgow outcome scale: 4–5) at 6 months. While among conservative management group, total 35.29% (24) had a favorable outcome (Glasgow outcome scale: 4–5). Difference in Glasgow outcome scale at 6 months of both groups was significant. Conclusion In conclusion, decompressive craniectomy is simple, safe, and better than conservative management alone.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI