冷冻干燥
海藻糖
双歧杆菌
微生物学
食品科学
细菌
生物
化学
色谱法
乳酸菌
发酵
生物化学
遗传学
作者
Alix Pourrat,Vinciane Baillieu,Solene Ansel,Maxime Leonardi,Pierre Poiron,Samuel Bellais,Muriel Paul,Biba Nebbad
标识
DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1618067
摘要
Background Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections. Freeze-drying offers a next-generation, more practical, and aesthetically acceptable FMT formulation that could facilitate standardized preparation methods. Viable preservation is a critical step in freeze-drying, yet no universal medium effectively protects both anaerobes and aerobes. Objective This study aimed to evaluate different protectants compared to trehalose 5% (T5) after confirming its efficacy. Methods A mix of inulin and glucosamine (IG5) and a High-antioxidant Matrix with trehalose (HM) were tested. Viability was assessed using colony-forming unit (CFU) enumeration and flow cytometry with a LIVE/DEAD™ staining method. Results T5 demonstrated satisfactory bacterial recovery after freeze-drying, with viability of 84 ± 28% for anaerobes and 59 ± 39% for Bifidobacterium (BIF), confirming its efficiency in our preparation facilities. While HM showed highest results (91 ± 7% for anaerobes, 121 ± 33% for BIF), it did not significantly outperform T5. IG5, however, resulted in a significant loss of bacteria, with only 16 ± 12% viability for anaerobes ( p = 0.016) and 19 ± 9% for BIF ( p = 0.031). Conclusion HM and T5 both proved effective for freeze-dried FMT, with HM yielding the highest recovery but not significantly outperforming T5. Given its simplicity and consistent results, T5 may serve as a reliable standalone protectant or as a base for improved formulations. IG5 showed significant bacterial loss and is unsuitable. Further biological validation and stability data will guide the development of optimized freeze-dried oral FMT capsules.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI