纠正性反馈
流利
语法
反问句
计算机科学
语言能力
能力(人力资源)
考试(生物学)
数学教育
第二语言写作
动态评估
心理学
语言学
第二语言
古生物学
哲学
发展心理学
生物
社会心理学
作者
K. James Hartshorn,Norman Evans,Paul F. Merrill,Richard R. Sudweeks,Diane Strong‐Krause,Neil Anderson
标识
DOI:10.5054/tq.2010.213781
摘要
Though recent research has shown that written corrective feedback (WCF) may improve aspects of writing accuracy in some English as a second language (ESL) contexts, many teachers continue to be confused about the practical steps they should utilize to help their students improve their writing. Moreover, some have raised concerns as to whether commonly used approaches to ESL writing pedagogy and grammar instruction are effective in helping students improve their linguistic accuracy. This article describes an instructional strategy we developed for improving students' accuracy based on insights gleaned from practice, research, and theory. We refer to this instructional methodology as dynamic WCF. The article also discusses a test of the methodology's efficacy that compared the performance of two groups of students, one using a conventional process approach to writing instruction and the other using the dynamic WCF approach. Test results demonstrated that although rhetorical competence, writing fluency, and writing complexity were largely unaffected by the dynamic WCF pedagogy, significant improvement was observed for writing accuracy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI