亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Twelve myths about shared decision making

审查 医疗保健 神话学 决策辅助工具 心理学 公共关系 医学 政治学 替代医学 历史 经典 病理 法学
作者
Philippe Thompson-Leduc
出处
期刊:Patient Education and Counseling [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:96 (3): 281-286 被引量:267
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.014
摘要

• This paper summarizes a keynote address held in the fall of 2013 at the International Conference on Communication in Healthcare. • There are many misconceptions about barriers to shared decision making in practice. • We investigated the evidence relating to the most common of these misconceptions. • We discuss the twelve most prevalent and summarize the state of the evidence. • These misconceptions should not hold back the implementation of shared decision making across the healthcare spectrum. As shared decision makes increasing headway in healthcare policy, it is under more scrutiny. We sought to identify and dispel the most prevalent myths about shared decision making. In 20 years in the shared decision making field one of the author has repeatedly heard mention of the same barriers to scaling up shared decision making across the healthcare spectrum. We conducted a selective literature review relating to shared decision making to further investigate these commonly perceived barriers and to seek evidence supporting their existence or not. Beliefs about barriers to scaling up shared decision making represent a wide range of historical, cultural, financial and scientific concerns. We found little evidence to support twelve of the most common beliefs about barriers to scaling up shared decision making, and indeed found evidence to the contrary. Our selective review of the literature suggests that twelve of the most commonly perceived barriers to scaling up shared decision making across the healthcare spectrum should be termed myths as they can be dispelled by evidence. Our review confirms that the current debate about shared decision making must not deter policy makers and clinicians from pursuing its scaling up across the healthcare continuum.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
peterhent完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Freeasy完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
1分钟前
李健的小迷弟应助莫提斯采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Zeegle完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
可爱的函函应助阿飞采纳,获得10
1分钟前
莫提斯发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
天天快乐应助明理依云采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
明理依云发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
李健应助小玉采纳,获得10
3分钟前
明理依云完成签到,获得积分20
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
小玉发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
张志超发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
阿飞发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
张志超发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
科研通AI6.1应助阿飞采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Alice完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
胡明轩完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
ajing完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
Owen应助qs采纳,获得10
4分钟前
张志超发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
ZXD1989完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
qs发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
大熊完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
番茄鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
汉堡包应助qs采纳,获得10
6分钟前
6分钟前
wjw发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
丘比特应助wjw采纳,获得10
6分钟前
Phiephie完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
华仔应助张志超采纳,获得10
7分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
Quality by Design - An Indispensable Approach to Accelerate Biopharmaceutical Product Development 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics 500
A Social and Cultural History of the Hellenistic World 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6394515
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8209642
关于积分的说明 17382197
捐赠科研通 5447728
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2880019
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1856472
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1699123