临床平衡
危害
安慰剂
临床试验
背景(考古学)
心理学
义务
研究伦理
替代医学
医学
心理治疗师
精神科
社会心理学
法学
政治学
病理
生物
古生物学
作者
Franklin G. Miller,Howard Brody
标识
DOI:10.1162/152651602317533523
摘要
The leading ethical position on placebo-controlled clinical trials is that whenever proven effective treatment exists for a given condition, it is unethical to test a new treatment for that condition against placebo. Invoking the principle of clinical equipoise, opponents of placebo-controlled trials in the face of proven effective treatment argue that they (1) violate the therapeutic obligation of physicians to offer optimal medical care and (2) lack both scientific and clinical merit. We contend that both of these arguments are mistaken. Clinical equipoise provides erroneous ethical guidance in the case of placebo-controlled trials, because it ignores the ethically relevant distinction between clinical trials and treatment in the context of clinical medicine and the methodological limitations of active-controlled trials. Placebo controls are ethically justifiable when they are supported by sound methodological considerations and their use does not expose research participants to excessive risks of harm.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI