亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Phase III randomized study of carboplatin pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab with initial versus “at progression” cerebral radiotherapy in advanced non squamous non-small cell lung cancer with asymptomatic brain metastasis

医学 培美曲塞 贝伐单抗 卡铂 肺癌 临床终点 内科学 化疗 肿瘤科 临床研究阶段 无进展生存期 无症状的 放射治疗 随机对照试验 外科 顺铂
作者
I. Monnet,Alain Vergnenégre,G. Robinet,Henri Berard,R. Lamy,Lionel Falchero,S. Vieillot,Roland Schött,Charles Ricordel,Stéphane Chouabe,P. A. Thomas,R. Gervais,Anne Madroszyk,Samir Abdiche,Anne Marie Chiappa,Laurent Greillier,Chantal Decroisette,J.B. Auliac,CHRISTOS CHOUAID,the GFPC 02-13 (METAL2) investigators
出处
期刊:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:13: 17588359211006983-17588359211006983 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1177/17588359211006983
摘要

Background: The role and timing of whole or stereotaxic brain radiotherapy (BR) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and asymptomatic brain metastases (aBMs) are not well established. This study investigates whether deferring BR until cerebral progression was superior to upfront BR for patients with aNSCLC and aBM. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, phase III trial, randomized (1:1) aNSCLC patients with aBMs to receive upfront BR and chemotherapy: platin–pemetrexed and bevacizumab in eligible patients, followed by maintenance pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab, BR arm, or the same chemotherapy with BR only at cerebral progression, chemotherapy (ChT) arm. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), global, extra-cerebral and cerebral objective response rate (ORR), toxicity, and quality of life [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02162537]. Results: The trial was stopped early because of slow recruitment. Among 95 included patients, 91 were randomized in 24 centers: 45 to BR and 46 to ChT arms (age: 60 ± 8.1, men: 79%, PS 0/1: 51.7%/48.3%; adenocarcinomas: 92.2%, extra-cerebral metastases: 57.8%, without differences between arms.) Significantly more patients in the BR-arm received BR compare with those in the ChT arm (87% versus 20%; p < 0.001); there were no significant differences between BR and ChT arms for median PFS: 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI):3.4–7.5 versus 4.8, 95% CI: 2.4–6.5 months, for median OS: 8.5, 95% CI:.6–11.1 versus 8.3, 95% CI:4.5–11.5 months, cerebral and extra-cerebral ORR (27% versus 13%, p = 0.064, and 30% versus 41%, p = 0.245, respectively). The ChT arm had more grade 3/4 neutropenia than the BR arm (13% versus 6%, p = 0.045); others toxicities were comparable. Conclusion: The significant BR rate difference between the two arms suggests that upfront BR is not mandatory in aNSCLC with aBM but this trial failed to show that deferring BR for aBM is superior in terms of PFS from upfront BR.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Calix发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
CYQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
6秒前
erty发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
吔94发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
孤独的芹菜完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
typhoon发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
何同学完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
fearless完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
王占雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
天天快乐的应助被哆啦小鱼采纳,获得10
18秒前
海绵宝宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
Sunvo完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
30秒前
typhoon完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
单身的曲奇完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
41秒前
42秒前
46秒前
erty发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
50秒前
忧郁思远完成签到,获得积分10
53秒前
Calix发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
眼睛大淇完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
zhou完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
wanci的应助被AA113采纳,获得10
1分钟前
风中睫毛完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
哆啦小鱼发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
钟钟完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
宝剑葫芦完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
A REVIEW OF THE V-22 DYNAMICS VALIDATION PROGRAM 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8129588
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9532099
关于积分的说明 21593013
捐赠科研通 7710958
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3417891
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2543446
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2459089