Overdiagnosis in low‐dose CT lung cancer screening: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of overall magnitude and subgroup variations

过度诊断 荟萃分析 医学 肺癌 肺癌筛查 腺癌 人口 子群分析 科克伦图书馆 癌症 肿瘤科 内科学 环境卫生
作者
Yihui Du,Chengmin Yuan,Xiaoqing Ni,Jingyou Miao,Hui Zhang,Yingming Jiang,Grigory Sidorenkov,Marcel J. W. Greuter,Geertruida H. de Bock,Lilu Ding
出处
期刊:International Journal of Cancer [Wiley]
卷期号:157 (11): 2269-2282
标识
DOI:10.1002/ijc.70049
摘要

Abstract Overdiagnosis is a major concern in low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening as it can detect indolent or slow‐growing cancers. This study aims to quantify overdiagnosis in LDCT screening and explore its variation by several factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library) were searched up to October 2024 for studies reporting overdiagnosis in LDCT lung cancer screening. Overdiagnosis was quantified using three metrics: percentage in screen‐detected cancers, percentage in all cancers in the screening group, and rate per 1000 screened individuals. Pooled estimates were calculated using random‐effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed by follow‐up time, histology, nodule type, geography, population risk, and gender. Twenty‐six studies were included (8 RCTs, 11 cohorts, 7 ecologic studies). Overdiagnosis declined substantially with extended follow‐up, with rates decreasing from 37% (95%CI: 14%–60%) to 7% (95%CI: −7% to 22%; p = .03) for screen‐detected cancers and from 25% (95%CI: 8%–41%) to 2% (95%CI: 4%–8%; p = .01) for all screening‐group cancers when follow‐up exceeded 5 years. This pattern corresponded to overdiagnosis dropping from 12.26 (95%CI: 3.87–20.64) to 1.46 (95%CI: −2.11 to 5.03) per 1000 screened individuals ( p = .02). Considerable variations emerged across subgroups: bronchioloalveolar carcinoma 82%, adenocarcinoma 28%, non‐adenocarcinoma −11%, p < .001; non‐solid cancers 66%, part‐solid cancers 31%, solid cancers 7%, p = .002; Asian countries 38%, Western countries 22%, p = .009; general population 38%, high‐risk population 22%, p = .010. These findings demonstrate that accurate overdiagnosis assessment requires sufficient follow‐up duration and must account for substantial variability across clinical and demographic factors.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
飞快的邴发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
程程发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
优秀完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
子衿发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小马甲应助草莓苹果采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
metare完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
赘婿应助欣慰人生采纳,获得10
3秒前
AN关闭了AN文献求助
3秒前
烟雾里发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
这家伙发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
xx完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
贪玩凤凰发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助yu采纳,获得10
6秒前
mwwbhu完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lyl1995发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Muzz完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
乔尔司空完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
soda发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
甜美的冰姬完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
田様应助抗压的希儿采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
Twonej应助陌上之心采纳,获得30
8秒前
8秒前
小俊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Owen应助海风采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
collapsar1完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
汉堡包应助liyk采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 40000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5748937
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5455693
关于积分的说明 15362267
捐赠科研通 4888480
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2628455
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1576842
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1533614