Overdiagnosis in low‐dose CT lung cancer screening: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of overall magnitude and subgroup variations

过度诊断 荟萃分析 医学 肺癌 肺癌筛查 腺癌 人口 子群分析 科克伦图书馆 癌症 肿瘤科 内科学 环境卫生
作者
Yihui Du,Chengmin Yuan,Xiaoqing Ni,Jingyou Miao,Hui Zhang,Yingming Jiang,Grigory Sidorenkov,Marcel J. W. Greuter,Geertruida H. de Bock,Lilu Ding
出处
期刊:International Journal of Cancer [Wiley]
卷期号:157 (11): 2269-2282
标识
DOI:10.1002/ijc.70049
摘要

Abstract Overdiagnosis is a major concern in low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening as it can detect indolent or slow‐growing cancers. This study aims to quantify overdiagnosis in LDCT screening and explore its variation by several factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library) were searched up to October 2024 for studies reporting overdiagnosis in LDCT lung cancer screening. Overdiagnosis was quantified using three metrics: percentage in screen‐detected cancers, percentage in all cancers in the screening group, and rate per 1000 screened individuals. Pooled estimates were calculated using random‐effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed by follow‐up time, histology, nodule type, geography, population risk, and gender. Twenty‐six studies were included (8 RCTs, 11 cohorts, 7 ecologic studies). Overdiagnosis declined substantially with extended follow‐up, with rates decreasing from 37% (95%CI: 14%–60%) to 7% (95%CI: −7% to 22%; p = .03) for screen‐detected cancers and from 25% (95%CI: 8%–41%) to 2% (95%CI: 4%–8%; p = .01) for all screening‐group cancers when follow‐up exceeded 5 years. This pattern corresponded to overdiagnosis dropping from 12.26 (95%CI: 3.87–20.64) to 1.46 (95%CI: −2.11 to 5.03) per 1000 screened individuals ( p = .02). Considerable variations emerged across subgroups: bronchioloalveolar carcinoma 82%, adenocarcinoma 28%, non‐adenocarcinoma −11%, p < .001; non‐solid cancers 66%, part‐solid cancers 31%, solid cancers 7%, p = .002; Asian countries 38%, Western countries 22%, p = .009; general population 38%, high‐risk population 22%, p = .010. These findings demonstrate that accurate overdiagnosis assessment requires sufficient follow‐up duration and must account for substantial variability across clinical and demographic factors.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
田様应助muyi采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
ff999完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
5秒前
5秒前
令狐擎宇发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助200
7秒前
猫小树完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
丘比特应助小巧的松思采纳,获得10
9秒前
科目三应助时歌采纳,获得10
9秒前
领导范儿应助稳重傲柔采纳,获得10
9秒前
Hello应助ZZW采纳,获得10
10秒前
xh发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
标致的冷梅完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
包容凌翠发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
科研通AI6应助张杰采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
Yukirin发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
阿蓉啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
斜玉完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
甜蜜听云完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
chen完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
菠小萝完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
liputao完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
mochaff完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
赘婿应助GOODYUE采纳,获得10
15秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
lzh发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
易烊干洗发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
向野发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Mental Health and Wellbeing 500
Elle ou lui ? Histoire des transsexuels en France 500
FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS 500
Nanoelectronics and Information Technology: Advanced Electronic Materials and Novel Devices 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5320015
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4461987
关于积分的说明 13885224
捐赠科研通 4352699
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2390804
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1384435
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1354258