The Perils of Misinterpreting and Misusing “Publication Bias” in Meta-analyses: An Education Review on Funnel Plot-Based Methods

作者
José Afonso,Rodrigo Ramírez‐Campillo,Filipe Manuel Clemente,Fionn Büttner,Renato Andrade
出处
期刊:Sports Medicine [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:54 (2): 257-269 被引量:171
标识
DOI:10.1007/s40279-023-01927-9
摘要

Publication bias refers to a systematic deviation from the truth in the results of a meta-analysis due to the higher likelihood for published studies to be included in meta-analyses than unpublished studies. Publication bias can lead to misleading recommendations for decision and policy making. In this education review, we introduce, explain, and provide solutions to the pervasive misuses and misinterpretations of publication bias that afflict evidence syntheses in sport and exercise medicine, with a focus on the commonly used funnel-plot based methods. Publication bias is more routinely assessed by visually inspecting funnel plot asymmetry, although it has been consistently deemed unreliable, leading to the development of statistical tests to assess publication bias. However, most statistical tests of publication bias (i) cannot rule out alternative explanations for funnel plot asymmetry (e.g., between-study heterogeneity, choice of metric, chance) and (ii) are grossly underpowered, even when using an arbitrary minimum threshold of ten or more studies. We performed a cross-sectional meta-research investigation of how publication bias was assessed in systematic reviews with meta-analyses published in the top two sport and exercise medicine journals throughout 2021. This analysis highlights that publication bias is frequently misused and misinterpreted, even in top tier journals. Because of conceptual and methodological problems when assessing and interpreting publication bias, preventive strategies (e.g., pre-registration, registered reports, disclosing protocol deviations, and reporting all study findings regardless of direction or magnitude) offer the best and most efficient solution to mitigate the misuse and misinterpretation of publication bias. Because true publication bias is very difficult to determine, we recommend that future publications use the term "risk of publication bias".

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小小小完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
molihuakai应助feifei采纳,获得100
1秒前
Len发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
风听你讲发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
朝明完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
荀幼旋完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
李爱国应助沃德吉尔汏采纳,获得10
7秒前
CodeCraft应助yuandashazi采纳,获得10
7秒前
裴之洽闻发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
派恩完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
晴天小白发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
许艺议完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
胖凡应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
所所应助当归采纳,获得10
12秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
12秒前
小马甲应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
dde应助rkai采纳,获得10
12秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
peterxia完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
东方元语应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
13秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
川荣李奈完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
dde应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
Green Fire Retardants for Polymeric Materials 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7617298
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9192534
关于积分的说明 19700503
捐赠科研通 7189590
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3271994
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434776
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2267043