医学
骨不连
射线照相术
放射性武器
核医学
股骨颈
流离失所(心理学)
卡帕
数学
口腔正畸科
外科
内科学
几何学
心理学
心理治疗师
骨质疏松症
作者
Drago Gašpar,Tomislav Crnković,Dražen Đurović,Dinko Podsednik,Ferdinand Slišurić
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2012-08-01
卷期号:9 (2): 243-7
被引量:30
摘要
To determine which of the classification systems for the femoral neck fracture between AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels is much more reliable and reproducible to predict a method of treatment, radiological prediction of nonunion and prediction of outcomes.Five observers classified 77 randomly selected anterior- posterior (AP) and lateral view preoperative radiographs of the femoral neck fractures according to AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems. The procedure was repeated on the same radiographs after three months. First classification is used to calculate interobserver agreement by kappa value between observers, while the first and second classification has served to calculate intraobserver kappa value for each examiner.Overall mean for classification system for interobserver agreement is: AO 0.44, AO subgroup 0.17, Garden 0.41 and Pauwels 0.19. Mean intraobserver agreement for AO group was 0.56, AO subgroup 0.38, Garden 0.49 and Pauwels 0.38 coefficient kappa value.Garden and AO group are useful for the division of femoral neck fractures without displacement and with displacement, but they are not for clinical use. AO subgroup and Pauwels classification are not recommended for further use.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI