医学
计算器
糖尿病
梅德林
精密医学
临床判断
重症监护医学
生物信息学
临床实习
试验预测值
医学物理学
临床决策
内科学
人工智能
临床诊断
生物标志物
连续血糖监测
临床试验
机器学习
作者
Julieanne Knupp,Pedro Cardoso,Katherine Young,Timothy J. McDonald,Kashyap Patel,Kevin Colclough,Ewan R. Pearson,Angus G. Jones,Sophie Jones,Shivani Misra,Andrew T. Hattersley,Trevelyan J. McKinley,Beverley M. Shields
出处
期刊:Diabetes Care
[American Diabetes Association]
日期:2025-10-14
卷期号:49 (4): 589-597
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Selecting appropriate individuals for monogenic diabetes genetic testing is challenging. We aimed to develop a new probability calculator, integrating clinical features and biomarkers, to aid identification of monogenic diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We developed two prediction models (for early-insulin-treated, proxy for type 1 diabetes; and not-early-insulin-treated patients, proxy for type 2 diabetes) using a Bayesian recalibration mixture model approach. We used case-control data (monogenic diabetes = 594, non-monogenic diabetes = 597) for initial model development (clinical features only) and recalibrated to population data (Using pharmacogeNetics to Improve Treatment in Early-onset Diabetes [UNITED] study, n = 1,299) including biomarkers (C-peptide and islet autoantibodies). We externally validated the calculator in an independent population-based cohort (n = 1,025). RESULTS: For early-insulin-treated individuals, the model incorporating biomarkers improved discrimination over using clinical features only (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [ROCAUC] 0.98 [95% credible interval [CrI] 0.95-0.98] vs. 0.80 [95% CrI 0.71-0.82], P < 0.001) or biomarkers alone (ROCAUC 0.96 [95% CI 0.95-0.97]). For not-early-insulin-treated participants, the calculator showed good discrimination (ROCAUC 0.86 [95% CrI 0.85-0.88]). Both models calibrated well and showed good discrimination in external validation (ROCAUC 0.98 [95% CrI 0.98-0.98] and 0.92 [95% CrI 0.90-0.93] for early- and not-early-insulin-treated individuals, respectively). Using a ≥5% probability threshold to guide testing achieved positive test rates for monogenic diabetes of 16-19%. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an updated monogenic diabetes probability calculator that integrates both clinical features and biomarkers, providing greater discrimination than using clinical features or biomarkers alone and providing appropriate measures for selecting individuals for monogenic diabetes diagnostic testing. This is now available as an online calculator and has immediate clinical utility for White European individuals diagnosed with diabetes ≤35 years.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI