Comparison of Different Thoracic Trauma Scoring Systems in Regards to Prediction of Post-Traumatic Complications and Outcome in Blunt Chest Trauma

医学 损伤严重程度评分 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 接收机工作特性 创伤中心 肺挫伤 胸部损伤 钝伤 修正创伤评分 迟钝的 外科 胸部(昆虫解剖学) 毒物控制 内科学 回顾性队列研究 伤害预防 急诊医学 解剖
作者
Philipp Mommsen,Christian Zeckey,Hagen Andruszkow,Jürgen Weidemann,Cornelia Frömke,Patrik Puljić,Martijn van Griensven,Michael Frink,Christian Krettek,Frank Hildebrand
出处
期刊:Journal of Surgical Research [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:176 (1): 239-247 被引量:65
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.018
摘要

Background As accurate assessment of thoracic injury severity in the early phase after trauma is difficult, we compared different thoracic trauma scores regarding their predictive ability for the development of post-traumatic complications and mortality. Materials and Methods Two hundred seventy-eight multiple trauma patients (ISS ≥ 16) age > 16 y with severe blunt chest trauma (AISchest ≥ 3) admitted between 2000 and 2009 to Level I Trauma center were included. Exclusion criteria were severe traumatic brain injury (AIShead ≥ 3) and penetrating thoracic trauma. The association between AISchest, Pulmonary Contusion score (PCS), Wagner-score and Thoracic Trauma Severity score (TTS), and duration of ventilation, length of ICU stay, development of post-traumatic complications, and mortality was investigated. Statistical analysis was performed with χ2-test, ANOVA, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Patients' mean age was 42.7 ± 17.0 y, the mean injury severity score was 28.7 ± 9.3 points. Overall, 60 patients (21.6%) developed ARDS, 143 patients (51.4%) SIRS, 110 patients (39.6%) sepsis, and 36 patients (13.0%) MODS. Twenty-two patients (7.9%) died. Among the examined thoracic trauma scores only the TTS was an independent predictor of mortality. With the TTS showing the best prediction power, the TTS, PCS, and Wagner-score were independent predictors of ventilation time, length of ICU stay, and the development of post-traumatic ARDS and MODS. Conclusions Thoracic trauma scores combining anatomical and physiologic parameters like the TTS seem to be most suitable for severity assessment and prediction of outcome in multiple trauma patients with concomitant blunt chest trauma. As accurate assessment of thoracic injury severity in the early phase after trauma is difficult, we compared different thoracic trauma scores regarding their predictive ability for the development of post-traumatic complications and mortality. Two hundred seventy-eight multiple trauma patients (ISS ≥ 16) age > 16 y with severe blunt chest trauma (AISchest ≥ 3) admitted between 2000 and 2009 to Level I Trauma center were included. Exclusion criteria were severe traumatic brain injury (AIShead ≥ 3) and penetrating thoracic trauma. The association between AISchest, Pulmonary Contusion score (PCS), Wagner-score and Thoracic Trauma Severity score (TTS), and duration of ventilation, length of ICU stay, development of post-traumatic complications, and mortality was investigated. Statistical analysis was performed with χ2-test, ANOVA, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Patients' mean age was 42.7 ± 17.0 y, the mean injury severity score was 28.7 ± 9.3 points. Overall, 60 patients (21.6%) developed ARDS, 143 patients (51.4%) SIRS, 110 patients (39.6%) sepsis, and 36 patients (13.0%) MODS. Twenty-two patients (7.9%) died. Among the examined thoracic trauma scores only the TTS was an independent predictor of mortality. With the TTS showing the best prediction power, the TTS, PCS, and Wagner-score were independent predictors of ventilation time, length of ICU stay, and the development of post-traumatic ARDS and MODS. Thoracic trauma scores combining anatomical and physiologic parameters like the TTS seem to be most suitable for severity assessment and prediction of outcome in multiple trauma patients with concomitant blunt chest trauma.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.1应助haotianli采纳,获得10
2秒前
canter发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
李悟尔发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
白真帅发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
苞米粒粒发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Xue_wenqiang完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
zjdmw发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
12秒前
小影发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
玄易完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
张龙雨完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
木流留马发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
科目三应助我来何忧采纳,获得10
20秒前
Peter完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
23秒前
微笑友容发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
小蘑菇应助四时见采纳,获得10
28秒前
flysky120发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
所所应助qqxt采纳,获得10
29秒前
你快睡吧发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
舞云涯发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
白真帅完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
momo123完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
傲娇蜻蜓完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
haotianli发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
科目三应助白真帅采纳,获得10
35秒前
欢乐完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
38秒前
41秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
The Immune System (Fifth Edition) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6568516
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8348024
关于积分的说明 17885565
捐赠科研通 5695723
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2944150
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1920062
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1796244