论辩的
同种类的
随机对照试验
质量(理念)
工作(物理)
群(周期表)
心理学
数学教育
数学
组合数学
医学
物理
语言学
热力学
外科
哲学
量子力学
作者
Joni Alfino,Mohammad Adnan Latief,Utami Widiati,Ali Saukah
出处
期刊:KnE Social Sciences
[Knowledge E]
日期:2022-03-22
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.18502/kss.v7i6.10603
摘要
Although the use of pair work in classrooms is relatively easy to employ, the pair-work technique has been attracting the attention of many researchers because this strategy is believed to be beneficial. This paper aimed to investigate the effect of different pair-work types (homogeneous, heterogeneous and randomized pairs) on students’ writing quality. Each pair wrote a single text: an argumentative essay. The average writing scores of the individual performances of the participants from the homogeneous group (n = 18), the heterogeneous group (n = 23), and the randomized group (n = 23) were compared. The results revealed that the participants in the randomized pair had the highest score (mean = 68.87), followed by the participants in the homogeneous group (mean = 64.17), and the lowest mean score was found in the heterogeneous group participants (mean = 57.13). Keywords: effect, pair work, writing quality
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI