双酚S
内科学
内分泌学
内分泌干扰物
双酚A
化学
窦卵泡
二羟基化合物
内分泌系统
卵巢
生物
激素
医学
有机化学
环氧树脂
作者
Ophélie Têteau,Manon Jaubert,Alice Desmarchais,Pascal Papillier,Aurélien Binet,Virginie Maillard,Sébastien Elis
出处
期刊:Reproduction
[Bioscientifica]
日期:2020-05-01
卷期号:159 (5): 571-583
被引量:29
摘要
Bisphenols, plasticisers used in food containers, can transfer to food. Bisphenol A (BPA) has been described as an endocrine disruptor and consequently banned from the food industry in several countries. It was replaced by a structural analogue, Bisphenol S (BPS). BPA action on the steroidogenesis is one of the mechanisms underlying its adverse effects on the efficiency of female reproduction. This study aimed to determine whether BPS is a safe alternative to BPA regarding GC functions. Antral follicles (2–6 mm), of approximatively 1000 adult ewe ovaries, were aspired and GC purified. For 48 h, ovine GC were treated with BPA or BPS (from 1 nM to 200 µM) and the effects on cell viability, proliferation, steroid production, steroidogenic enzyme expression and signalling pathways were investigated. Dosages at and greater than 100 μM BPA and 10 µM BPS decreased progesterone secretion by 39% ( P < 0.001) and 22% ( P = 0.040), respectively. BPA and BPS 10 μM and previously mentioned concentrations increased oestradiol secretion two-fold ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.082, respectively). Only 100 µM BPA induced a decrease ( P < 0.001) in gene expression of the enzymes of steroidogenesis involved in the production of progesterone. BPA reduced MAPK3/1 phosphorylation and ESR1 and ESR2 gene expression, effects that were not observed with BPS. BPA and BPS altered steroidogenesis of ovine GC. Thus, BPS does not appear to be a safe alternative for BPA. Further investigations are required to elucidate BPA and BPS mechanisms of action.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI