Association between use of macrolides in pregnancy and risk of major birth defects: nationwide, register based cohort study

相对风险 医学 置信区间 怀孕 绝对风险降低 产科 队列研究 活产 儿科 比率 优势比 队列 人口 回顾性队列研究 内科学 生物 遗传学
作者
Niklas Worm Andersson,Rasmus Huan Olsen,Jón Trærup Andersen
出处
期刊:BMJ [BMJ]
卷期号:: n107-n107 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.n107
摘要

Abstract Objective To examine the association between the use of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy and the risk of major birth defects. Design Nationwide, register based cohort study. Setting Denmark, 1997-2016. Participants Of 1 192 539 live birth pregnancies, pregnancies during which macrolides had been used (13 019) were compared with those during which penicillin (that is, phenoxymethylpenicillin) had been used (matched in a 1:1 ratio on propensity scores). Other comparative groups were pregnancies when macrolides had been used recently but before pregnancy (matched 1:1) and pregnancies where no antibiotics had been used (matched 1:4). Main outcome measures Association with an outcome of any major birth defect and specific subgroups of birth defects were assessed by relative risk ratios and absolute risk differences. Results In matched comparisons, 457 infants were born with major birth defects to women who had used macrolides during pregnancy (35.1 per 1000 pregnancies) compared with 481 infants (37.0 per 1000 pregnancies) to women who had used penicillin (relative risk ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.08), corresponding to an absolute risk difference of −1.8 (95% confidence interval −6.4 to 2.7) per 1000 pregnancies. The risk of major birth defects was not significantly increased for women who had used macrolides during pregnancy compared with those who had used macrolides recently but before becoming pregnant (relative risk ratio 1.00 (95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.14); absolute risk difference −0.1 (95% confidence interval −4.8 to 4.7) per 1000 pregnancies) or compared with women who did not use any antibiotics (1.05 (0.95 to 1.17); 1.8 (−1.7 to 5.3) per 1000 pregnancies). For all three comparative group analyses and in the analyses of use of individual macrolides, no significant increased risk of specific subgroups of birth defects associated with the use of macrolides was found. Conclusions In this nationwide cohort study, the use of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of major birth defects. Analyses of the associated risk of 12 specific subgroups of birth defects with the use of macrolides in pregnancy were not significant.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
tfr06发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
lntano完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
秋桦葉笙发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
bingbing发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
香蕉觅云应助蓝天采纳,获得10
1秒前
叶黄戍完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
yy完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
demon王完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小飞完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
哈基米完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
脑洞疼应助ysh123456789采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
yy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
阳光冰颜完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
赘婿应助wenxian采纳,获得10
6秒前
知识付费发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
夏栀mall发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
啊哈完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
llllllb发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
AAA建材批发原哥完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
bling完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
majid123完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
eternity发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
超大一块小饼干完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
琦琦z发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
12秒前
stt完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
TsuKe完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
amazeman111发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
Quality by Design - An Indispensable Approach to Accelerate Biopharmaceutical Product Development 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics 500
A Social and Cultural History of the Hellenistic World 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6395818
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8211042
关于积分的说明 17391680
捐赠科研通 5449146
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2880422
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1857017
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1699407