Posterior Tibial Artery Flap with an Adipofascial Extension: Clinical Application in Head and Neck Reconstruction with Detailed Insight into Septocutaneous Perforators and Donor-Site Morbidity

Background: The general aim of this study is to describe a new modification to the posterior tibial artery flap and its clinical application in head and neck reconstruction and to investigate the distribution of septocutaneous perforators of the posterior tibial artery. The specific aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this new modification to the posterior tibial artery flap and describe the flap survival rate and donor-site morbidity. Methods: From November of 2017 to August of 2018, 85 consecutive patients underwent posterior tibial artery flap reconstruction of the head and neck region after tumor extirpation. All posterior tibial artery flaps were harvested with a long adipofascial extension, and donor-site defects were closed with a triangular full-thickness skin graft harvested adjacent to the flap. Special consideration was given to the harvesting technique, distribution of the posterior tibial artery septocutaneous perforators, flap outcomes, and associated donor-site morbidity. Results: Flap survival was 100 percent. The number of septocutaneous perforators varied from one to five per leg, with a mean of 2.61 ± 1.15, and the septocutaneous perforators were mostly clustered in the middle and distal thirds of the medial surface of the leg. The prevalence of the presence of one, two, three, four, and five septocutaneous perforators per leg was 7, 33, 27, 19, and 14 percent, respectively. Total and partial skin graft loss at the donor site was reported in two and six patients, respectively, who were managed conservatively. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the preoperative and postoperative range of ankle movements ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: This new modification to the posterior tibial artery flap allows for the incorporation of more septocutaneous perforators into the flap, omits the need for a second donor site to close the donor-site defect, and provides sufficient tissue to fill the dead space after tumor resection and neck dissection. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.