Controversies, Consensuses and Guidelines on Modern Cataract Surgery by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO)

亚太地区 白内障手术 眼科 验光服务 医学 政治学 历史 民族学
作者
Sanjeev P. Srinivas,Alvin L. Young,Anders Behndig,David F. Chang,Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill,Youngsub Eom,Alex H. Fan,Oliver Findl,Kjell Gunnar Gundersen,Rohit Khanna,Thomas Kohnen,Francis S. Mah,Kevin M. Miller,Mayank A. Nanavaty,Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts,Tetsuro Oshika,Gede Pardianto,Nicolaas J. Reus,Sanduk Ruit,Namrata Sharma
出处
期刊:Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:: 100224-100224
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100224
摘要

Phacoemulsification has revolutionized cataract surgery since its introduction by Charles Kelman in 1967, becoming the gold standard for cataract removal in most parts of the world. Despite its widespread adoption and high success rates, there exists controversies within the ophthalmic community regarding various aspects of the procedure. An international panel comprising 25 experts from 18 countries/territories was established by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) to work on this consensus project. A total of 15 sections with 61 consensus statements were evaluated by the panel. Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery was not considered better than Phaco. An interferometer was considered essential for measuring the ocular parameters, and the need to choose an appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) formula was stressed. When considering multifocal IOLs, an assessment of the patient's personality profile, and a thorough discussion of the pros and cons of the choice before surgery was essential. Proper informed consent was also essential. The need to address complications like TASS promptly including a reassessment of operating rooms protocols was stressed. Finally, there was general agreement that manual surgeries have a significant role to play in eyes with large, dense nuclei and in populations where low-cost, high-volume surgery was necessary. Manual but sutureless approach was preferred where appropriate. Since there was agreement on about 60% of the 61 consensus statements, it reflected that there were variations in the real-world practice. Further studies are warranted and a follow-up consensus exercise after more information is available is worth considering.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
哆来米完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
DrW完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
搞对发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
S1Mon发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
kiki完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
风中的碧玉完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
迅速茹嫣完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
韧战发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
CodeCraft应助CWJ采纳,获得10
7秒前
小杭76应助wlei采纳,获得10
8秒前
语兰应助积极香菇采纳,获得20
8秒前
英姑应助kookery采纳,获得30
8秒前
9秒前
谷雨发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
SYLJ发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
VDC发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
hml123发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
木由发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小杭76应助酥斯基采纳,获得10
10秒前
灰太狼发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
张子怡完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
12秒前
苹果曼岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
李爱国应助cy采纳,获得10
13秒前
今后应助Pudding采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
Criminology34应助清明采纳,获得10
15秒前
隐形曼青应助xch采纳,获得10
15秒前
酷波er应助大睡神采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
十一发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
勤恳缘分完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
微纳米加工技术及其应用 500
Constitutional and Administrative Law 500
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 420
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5289383
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4441048
关于积分的说明 13826327
捐赠科研通 4323397
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2373160
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1368598
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1332483