Enhancing COPD classification using combined quantitative computed tomography and texture-based radiomics: a CanCOLD cohort study

Background: Recent advances in texture-based computed tomography (CT) radiomics have demonstrated its potential for classifying COPD. Methods: Participants from the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study were evaluated. A total of 108 features were included: eight quantitative CT (qCT), 95 texture-based radiomic and five demographic features. Machine-learning models included demographics along with texture-based radiomics and/or qCT. Combinations of five feature selection and five classification methods were evaluated; a training dataset was used for feature selection and to train the models, and a testing dataset was used for model evaluation. Models for classifying COPD status and severity were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with DeLong's test for comparison. SHapely Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to investigate the features selected. Results: A total of 1204 participants were evaluated (n=602 no COPD; n=602 COPD). There were no differences between the groups for sex (p=0.77) or body mass index (p=0.21). For classifying COPD status, the combination of demographics, texture-based radiomics and qCT performed better (AUC=0.87) than the combination of demographics and texture-based radiomics (AUC=0.81, p<0.05) or qCT alone (AUC=0.84, p<0.05). Similarly, for classifying COPD severity, the combination of demographics, texture-based radiomics and qCT performed better (AUC=0.81) than demographics and texture-based radiomics (AUC=0.72, p<0.05) or qCT alone (AUC=0.79, p<0.05). Texture-based radiomics and qCT features were among the top five features selected (15th percentile of the CT density histogram, CT total airway count, pack-years, CT grey-level distance zone matrix zone distance entropy, CT low-attenuation clusters) for classifying COPD status. Conclusion: Texture-based radiomics and conventional qCT features in combination improve machine‑learning models for classification of COPD status and severity.