In the last two decades academic discourse has come to be seen
as a purposeful interaction between writers and readers in
which the writers try to construct a credible representation of
themselves and their research and to align themselves with the
discourse community by evaluating their own work and views and
the work and views of others. The study of stance in academic
writing has concentrated primarily on showing differences in
the preferences of academic communities by discipline. This
paper seeks to examine differences in the expression of stance
in academic English in the writing habits of novice Czech
writers and expert native writers on the basis of an analysis
of the use of certain hedges and boosters in published research
articles and unpublished undergraduate and graduate
dissertations.