包裹体(矿物)
梅德林
医学
护理部
心理学
政治学
社会心理学
法学
作者
Berit Elisabeth Alving,Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen,Lars Thrysøe
摘要
Abstract Objective The purpose of this literature review is to provide an overview of the information retrieval behaviour of clinical nurses, in terms of the use of databases and other information resources and their frequency of use. Methods Systematic searches carried out in five databases and handsearching were used to identify the studies from 2010 to 2016, with a populations, exposures and outcomes ( PEO ) search strategy, focusing on the question: In which databases or other information resources do hospital nurses search for evidence based information, and how often? Results Of 5272 titles retrieved based on the search strategy, only nine studies fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. The studies are from the United States, Canada, Taiwan and Nigeria. The results show that hospital nurses’ primary choice of source for evidence based information is Google and peers, while bibliographic databases such as PubMed are secondary choices. Data on frequency are only included in four of the studies, and data are heterogenous. Conclusions The reasons for choosing Google and peers are primarily lack of time; lack of information; lack of retrieval skills; or lack of training in database searching. Only a few studies are published on clinical nurses’ retrieval behaviours, and more studies are needed from Europe and Australia.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI