Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography Versus Heavily T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography

Papanikolaou N, Prassopoulos P, Eracleous E, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography versus heavily T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography. Invest Radiol 2001;36:682–686. rationale and objectives. To investigate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography (CE-MRC) and compare it with single-shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiography (SSTSE-MRC). methods. Fifteen patients with suspected metastatic liver disease (n = 10) or biliary tree abnormalities (n = 5) underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (1.5-T system) examination before and after mangafodipir administration. Contrast-enhanced MRC with a three-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence after mangafodipir trisodium administration was compared with SSTSE-MRC. Four anatomic segments were evaluated: the intrapancreatic and extrapancreatic common bile duct segments, the cystic duct, and the area of hepatic bifurcation. Contrast-enhanced MRC and SSTSE-MRC were separately analyzed on a 5-point grading scale in terms of ductal segment visualization and lumen narrowing or dilatation. results. There was no difference (P = 0.375) in segment visualization between CE-MRC and SSTSE-MRC; 56 of the 60 segments were visualized by both techniques. In the evaluation of ductal narrowing or dilatation, nonsignificant differences (P = 0.500) were observed. Contrast-enhanced MRC was not influenced by fluid superimposition and provided additional information from background tissues. conclusions. Contract-enhanced MRC is a feasible technique showing anatomic correlation with SSTSE-MRC, and it can in addition provide functional information. Contrast-enhanced MRC may be used in selected patients when traditional SSTSE-MRC is inconclusive.