斯特罗普效应
析因分析
耐力训练
单调的工作
最大VO2
医学
物理疗法
计时审判
方差分析
心理学
有氧运动
认知
心率
内科学
血压
神经科学
作者
Dalton de Lima‐Júnior,Douglas Cavalcante Silva,Maria Elisa Caputo Ferreira,Leonardo de Sousa Fortes
摘要
Abstract We aimed to analyze the effect of brain endurance training on maximum oxygen consumption (VO 2máx ), time‐to‐exhaustion, and inhibitory control in amateur trained runners. We employed a mixed experimental design, with the group as the between‐participant factor and time as the within‐participant factor. 45 participants attended 36 training sessions over 12 weeks. The cognitive training group (CT) performed the Stroop word‐color task [trials of each type (congruent, incongruent, and neutral) were randomly presented during each training session], the endurance training group (ET) participated in a running training program (intensity was 60%Δ of maximal aerobic velocity and performed on a motor‐driven treadmill), and the brain endurance training group (BET) make cognitive and endurance training simultaneously over 12 weeks. The total time of each session (i.e., 20–40 min) was identical in the experimental groups. VO 2máx , time‐to‐exhaustion, and inhibitory control tests were measured before (baseline) and after (post‐experiment) the 12‐week intervention. A significant effect of interaction (group × time) for VO 2máx ( p < 0.05) was found. A post‐hoc test showed an increase in VO 2máx from baseline to post‐experiment only for ET (Δ% = 2.98) and BET (Δ% = 3.78) groups ( p < 0.05). Also, the analyses showed a significant interaction (group × time) for time‐to‐exhaustion ( p < 0.05), and a post‐hoc test revealed an improvement in time‐to‐exhaustion for ET (Δ% = 8.81) and BET (Δ% = 11.01) ( p < 0.05). No group × time interaction was found for accuracy and response time in the inhibitory control task ( p > 0.05). The results conclude that BET was not superior to ET for improving VO 2máx and time‐to‐exhaustion. Also, the findings conclude that BET improved inhibitory control similar to CT.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI