归属
心理学
判断
社会心理学
相关性(法律)
亲社会行为
因果关系(物理学)
发展心理学
物理
量子力学
政治学
法学
作者
Incheol Choi,Reeshad S. Dalal,Chu Kim‐Prieto,Hyekyung Park
标识
DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.46
摘要
The authors hypothesized that because the causal theories of East Asians were more holistic and complex than those of Americans, the amount of information considered before making a final attribution would be larger for East Asians than for Americans. This hypothesis was supported through 4 studies. When participants attempted to explain a deviant behavior (Study 1) or a prosocial behavior (Study 2), Korean participants took into consideration a greater amount of information than did either American or Asian American participants. Study 3 replicated the findings of Studies 1 and 2 within each culture. Finally, Study 4 established a link between the present findings and past research on culture and attribution. Namely, Study 4 found that Koreans made more external attributions than Americans because Koreans considered more information than did Americans.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI