The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 1—Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

医学 冲程(发动机) 人口 心脏外科 外科 旁路移植 冠状动脉搭桥手术 队列 动脉 内科学 机械工程 环境卫生 工程类
作者
David M. Shahian,Sean M. O’Brien,Giovanni Filardo,Victor A. Ferraris,Constance K. Haan,Jeffrey Rich,Sharon‐Lise T. Normand,Elizabeth R. DeLong,Cynthia M. Shewan,Rachel S. Dokholyan,Eric D. Peterson,Fred H. Edwards,Richard P. Anderson
出处
期刊:The Annals of Thoracic Surgery [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:88 (1): S2-S22 被引量:1220
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053
摘要

Background The first version of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS NCD) was developed nearly 2 decades ago. Since its inception, the number of participants has grown dramatically, patient acuity has increased, and overall outcomes have consistently improved. To adjust for these and other changes, all STS risk models have undergone periodic revisions. This report provides a detailed description of the 2008 STS risk model for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). Methods The study population consisted of 774,881 isolated CABG procedures performed on adult patients aged 20 to 100 years between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2006, at 819 STS NCD participating centers. This cohort was randomly divided into a 60% training (development) sample and a 40% test (validation) sample. The development sample was used to identify predictor variables and estimate model coefficients. The validation sample was used to assess model calibration and discrimination. Model outcomes included operative mortality, renal failure, stroke, reoperation for any cause, prolonged ventilation, deep sternal wound infection, composite major morbidity or mortality, prolonged length of stay (> 14 days), and short length of stay (< 6 days and alive). Candidate predictor variables were selected based on their availability in versions 2.35, 2.41, and 2.52.1 of the STS NCD and their presence in (or ability to be mapped to) version 2.61. Potential predictor variables were screened for overall prevalence in the study population, missing data frequency, coding concerns, bivariate relationships with outcomes, and their presence in previous STS or other CABG risk models. Supervised backwards selection was then performed with input from an expert panel of cardiac surgeons and biostatisticians. After successfully validating the fit of the models, the development and validation samples were subsequently combined, and the final regression coefficients were estimated using the overall combined (development plus validation) sample. Results The c-index for the mortality model was 0.812, and the c-indices for other endpoints ranged from 0.653 for reoperation to 0.793 for renal failure in the validation sample. Plots of observed versus predicted event rates revealed acceptable calibration in the overall population and in numerous subgroups. When patients were grouped into categories of predicted risk, the absolute difference between the observed and expected event rates was less than 1.5% for each endpoint. The final model intercept and coefficients are provided. Conclusions New STS risk models have been developed for CABG mortality and eight other endpoints. Detailed descriptions of model development and testing are provided, together with the final algorithm. Overall model performance is excellent. The first version of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS NCD) was developed nearly 2 decades ago. Since its inception, the number of participants has grown dramatically, patient acuity has increased, and overall outcomes have consistently improved. To adjust for these and other changes, all STS risk models have undergone periodic revisions. This report provides a detailed description of the 2008 STS risk model for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). The study population consisted of 774,881 isolated CABG procedures performed on adult patients aged 20 to 100 years between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2006, at 819 STS NCD participating centers. This cohort was randomly divided into a 60% training (development) sample and a 40% test (validation) sample. The development sample was used to identify predictor variables and estimate model coefficients. The validation sample was used to assess model calibration and discrimination. Model outcomes included operative mortality, renal failure, stroke, reoperation for any cause, prolonged ventilation, deep sternal wound infection, composite major morbidity or mortality, prolonged length of stay (> 14 days), and short length of stay (< 6 days and alive). Candidate predictor variables were selected based on their availability in versions 2.35, 2.41, and 2.52.1 of the STS NCD and their presence in (or ability to be mapped to) version 2.61. Potential predictor variables were screened for overall prevalence in the study population, missing data frequency, coding concerns, bivariate relationships with outcomes, and their presence in previous STS or other CABG risk models. Supervised backwards selection was then performed with input from an expert panel of cardiac surgeons and biostatisticians. After successfully validating the fit of the models, the development and validation samples were subsequently combined, and the final regression coefficients were estimated using the overall combined (development plus validation) sample. The c-index for the mortality model was 0.812, and the c-indices for other endpoints ranged from 0.653 for reoperation to 0.793 for renal failure in the validation sample. Plots of observed versus predicted event rates revealed acceptable calibration in the overall population and in numerous subgroups. When patients were grouped into categories of predicted risk, the absolute difference between the observed and expected event rates was less than 1.5% for each endpoint. The final model intercept and coefficients are provided. New STS risk models have been developed for CABG mortality and eight other endpoints. Detailed descriptions of model development and testing are provided, together with the final algorithm. Overall model performance is excellent.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ZONG完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
san完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
HL完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
854fycchjh发布了新的文献求助50
2秒前
一颗小圆圆完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
黑糖珍珠完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
英勇的半兰完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
小马甲应助香蕉菠娜娜采纳,获得10
3秒前
小丹小丹完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
咕_完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
杨一完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
hustscholar完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
怕黑的凝旋完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI6应助马小鱼采纳,获得10
7秒前
纯情的远山完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
若也发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
sevenlalala完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
出水芙蓉完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
朴实云应完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
努力发芽的小黄豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
高高的山兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
逢场作戱__完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
nieanicole完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
xi完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
lr完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
酷波er应助Edwin采纳,获得10
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
urologistwzy应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
16秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
彭于彦祖应助科研通管家采纳,获得150
16秒前
rayqiang完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
开心浩阑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 600
Extreme ultraviolet pellicle cooling by hydrogen gas flow (Conference Presentation) 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5175203
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4364514
关于积分的说明 13586872
捐赠科研通 4213639
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2311146
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1310124
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1258150