Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Refractory Shock: A Matched Analysis*

OBJECTIVES: To determine if angiotensin II is associated with improved outcomes as measured by 30- and 90-day mortality as well as other secondary outcomes such as organ dysfunction and adverse events. DESIGN: Retrospective, matched analysis of patients receiving angiotensin II compared with both historical and concurrent controls receiving equivalent doses of nonangiotensin II vasopressors. SETTING: Multiple ICUs in a large, university-based hospital. PATIENTS: Eight hundred thirteen adult patients with shock admitted to an ICU and requiring vasopressor support. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Angiotensin II use had no association with the primary outcome of 30-day mortality (60% vs 56%; p = 0.292). The secondary outcome of 90-day mortality was also similar (65% vs 63%; p = 0.440) as were changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores over a 5-day monitoring period after enrollment. Angiotensin II was not associated with increased rates of kidney replacement therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 0.88–2.19; p = 0.158) or receipt of mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.41–5.51; p = 0.539) after enrollment, and the rate of thrombotic events was similar between angiotensin II and control patients (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.71–1.48; p = 0.912). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe shock, angiotensin II was not associated with improved mortality or organ dysfunction and was not associated with an increased rate of adverse events.