Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies

医学 观察研究 超重 体质指数 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 置信区间 肥胖 系统回顾 内科学 不利影响 梅德林 政治学 法学
作者
Ingrid Toews,Szimonetta Lohner,Daniela Kuellenberg de Gaudry,Harriet Sommer,Joerg J Meerpohl
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.k4718
摘要

Abstract Objective To assess the association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners (NSS) and important health outcomes in generally healthy or overweight/obese adults and children. Design Systematic review following standard Cochrane review methodology. Data sources Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinicaltrials.gov, and reference lists of relevant publications. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies including generally healthy adults or children with or without overweight or obesity were eligible. Included study designs allowed for a direct comparison of no intake or lower intake of NSS with higher NSS intake. NSSs had to be clearly named, the dose had to be within the acceptable daily intake, and the intervention duration had to be at least seven days. Main outcome measures Body weight or body mass index, glycaemic control, oral health, eating behaviour, preference for sweet taste, cancer, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, mood, behaviour, neurocognition, and adverse effects. Results The search resulted in 13 941 unique records. Of 56 individual studies that provided data for this review, 35 were observational studies. In adults, evidence of very low and low certainty from a limited number of small studies indicated a small beneficial effect of NSSs on body mass index (mean difference −0.6, 95% confidence interval −1.19 to −0.01; two studies, n=174) and fasting blood glucose (−0.16 mmol/L, −0.26 to −0.06; two, n=52). Lower doses of NSSs were associated with lower weight gain (−0.09 kg, −0.13 to −0.05; one, n=17 934) compared with higher doses of NSSs (very low certainty of evidence). For all other outcomes, no differences were detected between the use and non-use of NSSs, or between different doses of NSSs. No evidence of any effect of NSSs was seen on overweight or obese adults or children actively trying to lose weight (very low to moderate certainty). In children, a smaller increase in body mass index z score was observed with NSS intake compared with sugar intake (−0.15, −0.17 to −0.12; two, n=528, moderate certainty of evidence), but no significant differences were observed in body weight (−0.60 kg, −1.33 to 0.14; two, n=467, low certainty of evidence), or between different doses of NSSs (very low to moderate certainty). Conclusions Most health outcomes did not seem to have differences between the NSS exposed and unexposed groups. Of the few studies identified for each outcome, most had few participants, were of short duration, and their methodological and reporting quality was limited; therefore, confidence in the reported results is limited. Future studies should assess the effects of NSSs with an appropriate intervention duration. Detailed descriptions of interventions, comparators, and outcomes should be included in all reports. Systematic review registration Prospero CRD42017047668.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
逆光发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
半眠日记完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小马甲应助LCY采纳,获得10
1秒前
MAKEYF发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
滕跃发发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
糖丸子啊啊啊啊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Chenq1nss发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
初见秋风完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
无极微光应助ss采纳,获得20
5秒前
AAAA发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
7秒前
7秒前
尉迟涵完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
王馨完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
CipherSage应助wwwwt采纳,获得10
9秒前
CipherSage应助123456789采纳,获得10
11秒前
彭于晏应助向日葵采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
菜老头发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
gao发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
吕易巧发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
完美世界应助滕跃发采纳,获得10
13秒前
熙慕完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
xixixi完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
王馨发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
科研通AI6应助David采纳,获得10
15秒前
认真搞科研啦完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
小蘑菇应助书白采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
qingmoheng应助飞快的从彤采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
dodo完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
朝颜完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
清欢发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
一丢丢完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Predation in the Hymenoptera: An Evolutionary Perspective 1800
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1561
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 1400
Specialist Periodical Reports - Organometallic Chemistry Organometallic Chemistry: Volume 46 1000
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Beyond the sentence: discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5513564
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4607809
关于积分的说明 14506782
捐赠科研通 4543334
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2489516
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1471463
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1443447