医学
临床终点
危险系数
化疗
内科学
化疗方案
癌症
伊立替康
中性粒细胞减少症
不利影响
性能状态
胃肠病学
外科
置信区间
随机对照试验
结直肠癌
作者
Yu Jeong Bang,Eduardo Yañez Ruiz,Eric Van Cutsem,Kuhn‐Uk Lee,Lucjan Wyrwicz,Michael Schenker,María Alsina,Min‐Hee Ryu,Hyun Cheol Chung,Ludovic Evesque,Salah-Eddin Al-Batran,Se Hoon Park,M. Lichinitser,Narikazu Boku,Markus Moehler,Janet Hong,Hua Xiong,Roland Hallwachs,Ilaria Conti,Julien Taı̈eb
标识
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdy264
摘要
Abstract Background There currently are no internationally recognised treatment guidelines for patients with advanced gastric cancer/gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) in whom two prior lines of therapy have failed. The randomised, phase III JAVELIN Gastric 300 trial compared avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line therapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC. Patients and methods Patients with unresectable, recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC were recruited at 147 sites globally. All patients were randomised to receive either avelumab 10mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2weeks or physician's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 80mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 or irinotecan 150mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, each of a 4-week treatment cycle); patients ineligible for chemotherapy received best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results A total of 371 patients were randomised. The trial did not meet its primary end point of improving OS {median, 4.6 versus 5.0months; hazard ratio (HR)=1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9–1.4]; P=0.81} or the secondary end points of PFS [median, 1.4 versus 2.7months; HR=1.73 (95% CI 1.4–2.2); P>0.99] or ORR (2.2% versus 4.3%) in the avelumab versus chemotherapy arms, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 90 patients (48.9%) and 131 patients (74.0%) in the avelumab and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17 patients (9.2%) in the avelumab arm and in 56 patients (31.6%) in the chemotherapy arm. Conclusions Treatment of patients with GC/GEJC with single-agent avelumab in the third-line setting did not result in an improvement in OS or PFS compared with chemotherapy. Avelumab showed a more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02625623.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI