医学
溶栓
改良兰金量表
优势比
荟萃分析
置信区间
冲程(发动机)
随机对照试验
内科学
子群分析
纤溶剂
临床试验
科克伦图书馆
不利影响
心脏病学
缺血性中风
组织纤溶酶原激活剂
心肌梗塞
缺血
机械工程
工程类
作者
Xingyu Yang,Zilan Wang,Huiru Chen,Youjia Qiu,Haiying Teng,Zhouqing Chen,Zhong Wang,Gang Chen,Zhong Wang,Gang Chen
标识
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2023.1137543
摘要
Background Several clinical trials have shown that intra-arterial thrombolysis using alteplase during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has a better outcome than MT alone in ischemic stroke management. We performed the current meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy and safety of MT with intra-arterial alteplase therapy. Methods The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to Mar. 2022 to identify the clinical trials that compared MT alone versus MT with intra-arterial alteplase therapy. STATA 16.0 was used for statistical analysis. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated with a random effect model. Results Seven studies involving 1,083 participants were included. The primary outcomes were better functional outcomes, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between 0 and 2 at 90 days, and successful recanalization, defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score ≥ 2b. Compared to MT alone, MT with intra-arterial alteplase did not lead to higher mTICI scores (OR 1.58, 95%CI 0.94 to 2.67, p = 0.085, I 2 = 16.8%) but did lead to better mRS (OR 1.37, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.86, p = 0.044). There was no increase in mortality or bleeding events in the overall or subgroup analyses. Conclusion MT with intra-arterial alteplase did not improve the recanalization rate but provided better functional outcomes. The intervention did not increase adverse effects in any subgroup at the same time. Clinical trial registration http://inplasy.com , identifier INPLASY202240027.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI