萃取(化学)
响应面法
产量(工程)
色谱法
化学
中心组合设计
乙醇
溶剂
萜烯
干物质
主成分分析
植物
材料科学
数学
生物化学
生物
统计
冶金
作者
Philip Wiredu Addo,Sai Uday Kumar Reddy Sagili,Samuel Eichhorn Bilodeau,Frédérick-Alexandre Gladu-Gallant,Douglas A. MacKenzie,Jennifer Bates,Garnet McRae,Sarah MacPherson,Maxime Paris,Vijaya Raghavan,Valérie Orsat,Mark Lefsrud
出处
期刊:Molecules
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2022-12-11
卷期号:27 (24): 8780-8780
被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.3390/molecules27248780
摘要
Efficient cannabis biomass extraction can increase yield while reducing costs and minimizing waste. Cold ethanol extraction was evaluated to maximize yield and concentrations of cannabinoids and terpenes at different temperatures. Central composite rotatable design was used to optimize two independent factors: sample-to-solvent ratio (1:2.9 to 1:17.1) and extraction time (5.7 min-34.1 min). With response surface methodology, predicted optimal conditions at different extraction temperatures were a cannabis-to-ethanol ratio of 1:15 and a 10 min extraction time. With these conditions, yields (g 100 g dry matter-1) were 18.2, 19.7, and 18.5 for -20 °C, -40 °C and room temperature, respectively. Compared to the reference ground sample, tetrahydrocannabinolic acid changed from 17.9 (g 100 g dry matter-1) to 15, 17.5, and 18.3 with an extraction efficiency of 83.6%, 97.7%, 102.1% for -20 °C, -40 °C, and room temperature, respectively. Terpene content decreased by 54.1% and 32.2% for extraction at -20 °C and room temperature, respectively, compared to extraction at -40 °C. Principal component analysis showed that principal component 1 and principal component 2 account for 88% and 7.31% of total variance, respectively, although no significant differences in cold ethanol extraction at different temperatures were observed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI