Patient privacy and autonomy: a comparative analysis of cases of ethical dilemmas in China and the United States

生命伦理学 医学哲学 自治 中国 知情同意 异议 医学伦理学 医学 政治学 心理学 法学 替代医学 病理
作者
Hui Zhang,Hongmei Zhang,Zhenxiang Zhang,Wang Yu-ming
出处
期刊:BMC Medical Ethics [BioMed Central]
卷期号:22 (1) 被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12910-021-00579-6
摘要

Abstract Background Respect for patients’ autonomy is usually considered to be an important ethical principle in Western countries; privacy is one of the implications of such respect. Healthcare professionals frequently encounter ethical dilemmas during their practice. The past few decades have seen an increased use of courts to resolve intractable ethical dilemmas across both the developed and the developing world. However, Chinese and American bioethics differ largely due to the influence of Chinese Confucianism and Western religions, respectively, and there is a dearth of comparative studies that explore cases of ethical dilemmas between China and the United States. Methods This paper discusses four typical cases with significant social impact. First, it compares two cases concerning patient privacy: the “Shihezi University Hospital Case”, in which a patient was used as a clinical teaching object without her permission, and the “New York-Presbyterian Hospital Case”, in which the hospital allowed the filming of a patient’s treatment without his consent. Second, it compares two cases regarding patient autonomy and potentially life-saving medical procedures: the “Case of Ms. L”, concerning a cohabitant’s refusal to sign a consent form for a pregnant woman’s caesarean, and the “Case of Mrs. V”, concerning a hospital’s insistence upon a blood transfusion for a dissenting patient. This paper introduces the supporting and opposing views for each case and discusses their social impact. It then compares and analyses the differences between China and the United States from cultural and legislative perspectives. Conclusions Ethical dilemmas have often occurred in China due to the late development of bioethics. However, the presence of bioethics earlier in the US than in China has not spared the US of ethical dilemmas. This paper highlights lessons and inspiration from the cases for healthcare professionals and introduces readers to the role and weight of privacy and autonomy in China and in the US from the perspectives of different cultures, religions and laws.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
yyj发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
GAC发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
科研通AI6.4应助peACE采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Yanxb发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
英俊的铭应助Amber采纳,获得10
2秒前
英姑应助qqqqqxing采纳,获得10
3秒前
是小妤呀完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
Hello应助shxygpz采纳,获得10
3秒前
鸡蛋酱完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
汉堡包应助HCS采纳,获得10
4秒前
NexusExplorer应助路途中追逐采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
Dzinver发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
长安发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
清晨的小鹿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
7秒前
许先森发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
深情安青应助全没了采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
wenwen完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
Gloria完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
文献快来发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
hhhh完成签到 ,获得积分20
9秒前
NKTreg发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
桐桐应助Pendulium采纳,获得10
9秒前
KEYANTONG发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
打打应助GAOBIN000采纳,获得10
10秒前
molihuakai应助0077采纳,获得10
10秒前
传奇3应助壮观的晓露采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Radical Reactions 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7356758
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8967456
关于积分的说明 19054532
捐赠科研通 7004380
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3222316
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2386476
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2202905