随机对照试验
工具变量
心理学
计量经济学
医学
数学
内科学
作者
Joshua D. Angrist,Caixia Gao,Peter Hull,Robert W. Yeh
出处
期刊:NEJM evidence
[New England Journal of Medicine]
日期:2025-03-25
卷期号:4 (4)
标识
DOI:10.1056/evidctw2400204
摘要
Many randomized clinical trials fail to play out as intended: some participants assigned to the treatment group remain untreated, while others assigned to the control group cross over and receive treatment. In such settings, intention-to-treat analyses that compare participants by treatment assignment are diluted by noncompliance, while per-protocol analyses that compare participants by treatment received are contaminated by selection bias. Instrumental variables methods can address both problems. We explain the rationale for instrumental variables estimation in clinical trials and illustrate instrumental variables methods through an analysis of the effect of revascularization on quality of life. We argue that instrumental variables analysis should be central to pragmatic trials of all kinds, strategy trials in particular, and emerging "nudge trials" that encourage specific health-related behaviors in large populations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI