系统回顾
可用性
科克伦图书馆
医学
随机对照试验
梅德林
荟萃分析
医学物理学
心理学
计算机科学
外科
内科学
政治学
人机交互
法学
作者
Ella Flemyng,Theresa HM Moore,Isabelle Boutron,Julian P. T. Higgins,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Camilla Hansen Nejstgaard,Kerry Dwan
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112102
摘要
A systematic review identifies, appraises and synthesises all the empirical evidence from studies that meet prespecified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. As part of the appraisal, researchers use explicit methods to assess risk of bias in the results' from included studies that contribute to the review's findings, to improve our confidence in the review's conclusions. Randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane Reviews have used a specific risk of bias tool to assess these included studies since 2008. In 2019, a new version of this tool, Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2), was launched to improve its usability and to reflect current understanding of how the causes of bias can influence study results. Cochrane implemented RoB 2 in a phased approach, with users of the tool informing guidance development. This paper highlights learning for all systematic reviewers (Cochrane and non-Cochrane) from the phased implementation, highlighting differences between the original version of the tool and RoB 2, consideration of reporting systematic review protocols or full review reports that have used RoB 2, and some tips shared by authors during the pilot phase of the implementation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI