计算机科学
多物理
国际商用机器公司
计算科学
网格
浸入边界法
多边形网格
流体力学
透视图(图形)
简单
利用
素描
边界(拓扑)
机械
数学
算法
计算机图形学(图像)
有限元法
几何学
物理
人工智能
量子力学
热力学
光学
数学分析
计算机安全
标识
DOI:10.1146/annurev-fluid-120720-022129
摘要
Immersed boundary methods (IBMs) are versatile and efficient computational techniques to solve flow problems in complex geometric configurations that retain the simplicity and efficiency of Cartesian structured meshes. Although these methods became known in the 1970s and gained credibility only in the new millennium, they had already been conceived and implemented at the beginning of the 1960s, even if the early computers of those times did not allow researchers to exploit their potential. Nowadays IBMs are established numerical schemes employed for the solution of many complex problems in which fluid mechanics may account for only part of the multiphysics dynamics. Despite the indisputable advantages, these methods also have drawbacks, and each problem should be carefully analyzed before deciding which particular IBM implementation is most suitable and whether additional modeling is necessary. High–Reynolds number flows constitute one of the main limitations of IBMs owing to the resolution of thin wall shear layers, which cannot benefit from anisotropic grid refinement at the boundaries. To alleviate this weakness, researchers have developed IBM-compliant wall models and local grid refinement strategies, although in these cases possible pitfalls must also be considered.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI