医学
可视模拟标度
焦虑
随机对照试验
检查表
物理疗法
麻醉
外科
精神科
心理学
认知心理学
作者
Wenjun Luo,Chunqu Chen,Weijian Zhou,Angyang Cao,Weichao Zhu,Yanling Zhou,Zhipeng Xu,Jianhua Wang,Binbin Zhu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.10.023
摘要
Summary
Introduction
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the biophilic virtual reality (VR) method on children's pain and anxiety undergoing circumcision. Materials and Methods
This randomized controlled study used a parallel trial design guided by the CONSORT checklist. A total of 106 children were included in the analysis. Intraoperative anxiety was assessed by using the simplified Chinese version of the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (CmYPAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), heart rate (HR), and Anxiety index (Ai). Intraoperative pain was assessed by using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), and Pain index (Pi). The Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between Ai and the CmYPAS. The primary outcomes were CmYPAS, VAS, and FPS-R, which were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results
Baseline variables were not significantly different between the biophilic virtual reality (BVR) group (34 patients), the indoor virtual reality (IVR) group (36 patients), and the blank control group (36 patients). The CmYPAS scores during surgery were significantly lower in the BVR group and the IVR group versus the blank control group (25.0[22.9-29.2], 22.9[22.9-29.2], 33.3[33.3-38.5] respectively; P < 0.001). The VAS scores during surgery were significantly lower in the BVR group and the IVR group versus the blank control group (5.0[3.0-7.0], 3.0[2.0-5.0], 6.0[5.0-8.8] respectively; P < 0.001). The FPS-R scores during surgery were significantly lower in the BVR group and IVR group versus the blank control group (2.0[1.8-4.2], 3.0[2.0-4.8], 5.5[5.0-8.0], respectively; P < 0.001). At removal of the foreskin, Pi were significantly lower in the BVR group and IVR group versus the blank control group (6.9[4.1], 7.7[3.3], 9.8[6.2] respectively; P=0.033). The Ai scores at each time point were significantly lower in the BVR group and IVR group versus the control (P =0.015,P=0.006 respectively). The correlation analysis of Ai (at removal of the foreskin) and CmYPAS scores in children showed that the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.194 (P = 0.046). Discussion
This is the first RCT to investigate the effects of biophilic-VR in children undergoing circumcision. This study demonstrates a reduction in pediatric intraoperative pain and anxiety with the use of VR. Conclusion
Intraoperative VR may be an effective noninvasive modality for reducing pain and anxiety during circumcision. Pi and Ai might be used to assess subjective pain and anxiety in patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI