[Comparison study on short-term efficacy between ROSA orthopedic surgical robotic-assisted and traditional manual total knee arthroplasty].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term clinical outcomes and radiographic results of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) using the ROSA robot with those of traditional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 55 patients who underwent unilateral TKA due to end-stage knee osteoarthritis(KOA), defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ, between June 2024 and December 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach:the RATKA group and the conventional TKA group. The RATKA group included 25 patients, consisting of 6 males and 19 females, aged from 46 to 84 years old with a mean of ( 65.20±1.93 ) years old. Among them, 11 cases involved the left knee and 14 cases involved the right knee. The traditional TKA group included 30 patients, consisting of 5 males and 25 females, aged from 57 to 85 years old with an average of (68.73±1.36) years old. Among them, 13 cases involved the left knee and 17 cases involved the right knee. Operation time, total perioperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Radiographic evaluation included preoperative and postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, and postoperative lateral tibial component angle (LTC), frontal femoral component angle (FFC), sagittal lateral femoral component angle(LFC), and frontal tibial component (FTC), for the assessment of lower extremity mechanical axis and prosthesis position. The American Knee Society score(KSS), visual analogue scale(VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint preoperatively and postoperatively were compared between the two groups to evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy. RESULTS: <0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to traditional TKA, ROSA robotic system-assisted TKA in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis achieved superior accuracy in prosthesis positioning and lower limb mechanical axis restoration, showing satisfactory clinical outcomes. Although short-term outcomes are favorable, long-term clinical efficacy requires further investigation.