坎德萨坦
医学
内科学
心脏病学
心力衰竭
冠状动脉疾病
危险系数
狼牙棒
心肌梗塞
临床终点
糖尿病
血管紧张素受体
血管紧张素II
随机对照试验
置信区间
血压
内分泌学
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
作者
Hiroshi Kasanuki,Nobuhisa Hagiwara,S Hosoda,Tetsuya Sumiyoshi,Tsuyoshi Honda,Kazuo Haze,Michio Nagashima,J.-i. Yamaguchi,Hideki Origasa,Mitsuyoshi Urashima,Hiroshi Ogawa,for the HIJ-CREATE Investigators
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp101
摘要
AIMS: To test whether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) therapy can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events compared with non-ARB-based standard pharmacotherapy in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). There were 552 primary events during a median follow-up of 4.2 years: 264 (25.8%) in the candesartan group and 288 (28.1%) in the non-ARB group (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.06). No significant differences existed between groups in terms of cardiovascular death (2.7 vs. 2.4%, 1.14; 0.66-1.95), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.8 vs. 2.5%, 1.12; 0.66-1.88), or heart failure (3.9 vs. 4.3%, 0.91; 0.59-1.40). New-onset diabetes was diagnosed significantly less frequently with candesartan than with non-ARBs (0.37; 0.16-0.89). Incidence of study drug discontinuation due to adverse events was lower with candesartan than with non-ARBs (5.7 vs. 12.2%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although candesartan showed no significant differences in MACE compared with the non-ARB treatment group, the drug significantly reduced the incidence of new-onset diabetes and was better tolerated. This study is registered as International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial No. UMIN000000790.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI