Comparison of sevoflurane volatile induction/maintenance anaesthesia and propofol–remifentanil total intravenous anaesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy under spontaneous breathing for tracheal/bronchial foreign body removal in children

医学 瑞芬太尼 麻醉 异丙酚 七氟醚 脑电双频指数 支气管镜检查 外科
作者
Ren Liao,Jing Y Li,Guang Y Liu
出处
期刊:European Journal of Anaesthesiology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:27 (11): 930-934 被引量:64
标识
DOI:10.1097/eja.0b013e32833d69ad
摘要

Foreign body aspiration is a life-threatening condition, with children under 3 years of age most at risk. This study was designed to compare the clinical characteristics of sevoflurane volatile induction/maintenance anaesthesia (VIMA) and propofol-remifentanil total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) for children undergoing rigid bronchoscopy under spontaneous breathing for tracheal/bronchial foreign body removal.Sixty-four children undergoing rigid bronchoscopy were allocated randomly to receive sevoflurane (Group VIMA; n = 32) or propofol-remifentanil (Group TIVA, n = 32) between 2007 and 2009. Respiratory rate, heart rate and mean blood pressure were compared at the time points including baseline level (T 0); laryngoscopy (T lary); insertion of rigid bronchoscope (T bron); 5, 10 and 20 min during procedure (T 5 min, T 10 min, T 20 min); the end of procedure (Tend) and discharge (T dis). Induction time, emergence time, intubating condition scores and the incidence of adverse events were compared.Time for loss of consciousness (Group VIMA 95.6 ± 15.2 s vs. Group TIVA 146.2 ± 26.9 s, P < 0.05), time of Bispectral Index value decreased to 40 (Group VIMA 115.3 ± 16.5 s vs. Group TIVA 160.4 ± 25.8 s, P < 0.05) and emergence time (Group VIMA 10.5 ± 2.6 min vs. Group TIVA 16.9 ± 3.1 min, P < 0.05) in Group VIMA were significantly shorter than those in Group TIVA. Intubating condition scores between the two groups were comparable (8.1 ± 0.9 in Group VIMA vs. 8.1 ± 1.0 in Group TIVA). The incidence rates of breath holding (Group VIMA 6.25% vs. Group TIVA 31.25%, P < 0.05) and desaturation (Group VIMA 15.63% vs. Group TIVA 37.50%, P < 0.05) in Group VIMA were significantly lower than those in Group TIVA. Heart rate, mean blood pressure and respiratory rate were significantly higher in Group VIMA than in Group TIVA.Compared with propofol-remifentanil TIVA, sevoflurane VIMA provides more stable haemodynamics and respiration, faster induction and recovery and higher incidence of excitement in paediatric patients undergoing tracheal/bronchial foreign body removal under spontaneous breathing.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
充电宝应助可可采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
melon发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
ning完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
king_creole完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
njebcuiebvjc完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
yuxuan发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
承影完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
还活着发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Doraemon发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
高高的城发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Jing发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
思源应助lll采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
沉静易形发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
路咕咕嗼发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
田様应助我吃浴巾采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
健康的豁发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
kuba发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
胡雅琴完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
空气鱼完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
郭1完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
noir完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
机灵花生完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
养猪的张三完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
ZRT完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7757112
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9303589
关于积分的说明 20275045
捐赠科研通 7340667
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3311745
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462624
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2325433