医学
血液透析
置信区间
透析
不利影响
心脏病学
内科学
随机对照试验
重症监护
血压
外科
重症监护医学
作者
Dana C. Miskulin,Jennifer Gassman,Ronald Schrader,Ambreen Gul,Manisha Jhamb,David W. Ploth,Lavinia Negrea,Raymond Y. Kwong,Andrew S. Levey,Ajay Singh,Antonia Harford,Susan Paine,Cynthia Kendrick,Mahboob Rahman,Philip G. Zager
标识
DOI:10.1681/asn.2017020135
摘要
The optimal BP target for patients receiving hemodialysis is unknown. We randomized 126 hypertensive patients on hemodialysis to a standardized predialysis systolic BP of 110–140 mmHg (intensive arm) or 155–165 mmHg (standard arm). The primary objectives were to assess feasibility and safety and inform the design of a full-scale trial. A secondary objective was to assess changes in left ventricular mass. Median follow-up was 365 days. In the standard arm, the 2-week moving average systolic BP did not change significantly during the intervention period, but in the intensive arm, systolic BP decreased from 160 mmHg at baseline to 143 mmHg at 4.5 months. From months 4–12, the mean separation in systolic BP between arms was 12.9 mmHg. Four deaths occurred in the intensive arm and one death occurred in the standard arm. The incidence rate ratios for the intensive compared with the standard arm (95% confidence intervals) were 1.18 (0.40 to 3.33), 1.61 (0.87 to 2.97), and 3.09 (0.96 to 8.78) for major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and vascular access thrombosis, respectively. The intensive and standard arms had similar median changes (95% confidence intervals) in left ventricular mass of −0.84 (−17.1 to 10.0) g and 1.4 (−11.6 to 10.4) g, respectively. Although we identified a possible safety signal, the small size and short duration of the trial prevent definitive conclusions. Considering the high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving hemodialysis, a full-scale trial is needed to assess potential benefits of intensive hypertension control in this population.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI