目的论
论证(复杂分析)
认识论
口译(哲学)
宪法
哲学
自然(考古学)
因果关系(物理学)
化学
政治学
法学
物理
生物
量子力学
古生物学
生物化学
语言学
标识
DOI:10.1515/kantyb-2017-0002
摘要
Abstract In the Critique of Teleological Judgment, Kant endorses a distinct model of causal explanation. He claims that we explain natural wholes as the causal effect of their parts and the forces governing them, i. e., we explain mechanistically or following the analytic-synthetic method of modern science. According to McLaughlin’s influential interpretation, Kant endorses in this, without argument, the predominant scientific method of his time. The text suggests, however, that we explain mechanistically according to the constitution of our discursive understanding. The paper attempts to reconstruct the argument establishing this claim.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI