贝利婴儿发育量表
蹒跚学步的孩子
心理学
原始分数
粗大运动技能
发展心理学
结构效度
儿童发展
心理测量学
认知
儿科
运动技能
临床心理学
医学
精神运动学习
精神科
统计
原始数据
数学
作者
Yen‐Ting Yu,Wu‐Shiun Hsieh,Chyong-Hsin Hsu,Li-Chiou Chen,Wang-Tso Lee,Nan-Chang Chiu,Yi Chang Wu,Suh‐Fang Jeng
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.006
摘要
The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – 3rd Edition (Bayley-III) was updated to enhance its usefulness for contemporary child developmental assessment. However, recent data in Western countries have implicated the overestimation of child development by the new instrument. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric features of the Bayley-III for term and preterm infants in Taiwan. Forty-seven term infants and 167 preterm infants were prospectively examined with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development – 2nd Edition (BSID-II) and the Bayley-III at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of age (corrected for prematurity). The psychometric properties examined included reliability, construct validity, and known-group validity. The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of the Bayley-III were good to excellent. The correlations between the BSID-II and Bayley-III raw scores were good to excellent for the cognitive and motor items and low to excellent for the language items. Term infants achieved higher composite scores than preterm infants on all of the Bayley-III scales (p < 0.05). However, their rates of developmental delay were lower than the previously established prevalence estimates. The Bayley-III cut-off composite score was adjusted 10–20, 1–13, and 12–24 points higher than 70 for optimal prediction of cognitive, language, and motor delay, respectively, as defined by the BSID-II index score < 70. The Bayley-III is a reliable instrument that extends its previous edition, especially in early language assessment. However, the upward adjustment of its cut-off score is recommended for the accurate identification of developmental delay in term and preterm Taiwanese infants.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI