Blood-based biomarkers and delirium in critically ill adults in the ICU: a systematic review

谵妄 医学 重症监护医学 病危 重症监护室 生物标志物 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 重症监护 系统回顾 急诊医学 荟萃分析 比例(比率) 采样(信号处理) 叙述性评论 数据提取 入射(几何) 金标准(测试) 疾病严重程度 样本量测定 风险评估 临床意义
作者
Julie Kathrine Ryberg Sankel,Naia Bech Cranø,Pär I. Johansson,Lars Nørvang Andersen
出处
期刊:Intensive Care Medicine Experimental [Springer Nature]
卷期号:14 (1) 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1186/s40635-026-00894-5
摘要

PURPOSE: Delirium is frequent and associated with increased health expenditures, unfavourable outcomes and increased mortality. Diagnosis currently relies on clinical scales and is often missed. However, blood-based biomarkers may represent a feasible tool to enhance risk stratification, early diagnosis, and monitoring. We aimed to identify blood-based biomarkers associated with delirium in adult intensive care unit patients, to provide a structured summary of the evidence, and to highlight gaps of knowledge to inform future research. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to 3rd September 2025 with no date or language restrictions. Eligible studies were observational, assessing associations between blood-based biomarkers and delirium in critically ill adults admitted to an intensive care unit. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess study quality. Data were qualitatively synthesized in a systematic narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Out of 2130 records including duplicates, 61 studies were included, comprising 39,355 adult patients, of whom 16,762 were screened positive for delirium. Delirium definition, assessment tools and frequency, reported delirium outcomes, and timing of biomarker sampling varied. In total, 153 blood-based biomarkers were identified, 101 were significantly associated with delirium and 40 were associated with delirium across two studies or more. Study quality was generally poor and substantial study heterogeneity limited comparability. CONCLUSION: Current evidence does not support clinical use of any biomarker. Poor study quality, small sample sizes, and considerable methodological heterogeneity limit interpretation, generalizability, validation, and firm conclusions. Standardized methodology and international consensus are essential in future research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
吃的发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
lhy12345完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被森山采纳,获得20
4秒前
0066完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
小莲子完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
飞翔完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
CipherSage的应助被蓝蓝的腿毛采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
11秒前
nanfeng完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
苏坡idol完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
MZT完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
在水一方的应助被我哪敢吱声采纳,获得10
12秒前
ste56完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Dragonfln发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
14秒前
曹丛通发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
灵巧谷芹发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
kjdgahdg发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
青桔柠檬完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
天天驳回了Lucas的应助
21秒前
22秒前
深情安青的应助被抹缇卡采纳,获得10
22秒前
完美世界的应助被白白采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
华仔的应助被Lynne采纳,获得10
24秒前
凌时爱吃零食完成签到,获得积分0
25秒前
Sirysl发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
25秒前
25秒前
25秒前
JamesPei的应助被Zesong采纳,获得10
26秒前
万能图书馆的应助被灵巧谷芹采纳,获得10
26秒前
HAO完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
CKK发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Issues in Task-Based Language Teaching 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7783710
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9322987
关于积分的说明 20392570
捐赠科研通 7372332
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3320737
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2468747
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2336971