工作组
奇纳
民间社会
公共关系
人口
医学
工作(物理)
人口健康
知识管理
政治学
护理部
环境卫生
工程类
法学
计算机科学
心理干预
计算机网络
政治
机械工程
作者
Annika Bäck,Michaela Modin Asper,Stephanie Madsen,Leif Eriksson,Veronica Aurelia Costea,Henna Hasson,Anna Bergström
出处
期刊:BMJ Open
[BMJ]
日期:2025-03-01
卷期号:15 (3): e092525-e092525
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092525
摘要
Objectives Cross-sector collaboration has been encouraged to improve population health. Both local authorities and civil society organisations impact population health, but less is known about how the actual process of collaboration is done. This scoping review aims to explore how local authorities and civil society organisations collaborate with the ambition to improve population health. Design This scoping review was informed by the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute, and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Data sources Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL and Sociological Abstracts were searched from inception to September 2022. Eligibility criteria We included peer-reviewed empirical studies that describe the initiation, execution or sustainment of collaboration for health between local authorities and civil society organisations. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data, which was summarised and analysed using inductive content analysis. Results In the 79 included articles, collaborations between local authorities and civil society organisations entailed many different aspects, from exchanging knowledge, allocating resources, providing different types of support or human resources, training, forming different working groups, agreements and working plans to gathering data for needs analysis or evaluation. Few articles described how the collaboration had been initiated or sustained. Initiation was done through advocacy, needs assessments, making a request, creating a workgroup and conducting a pilot study. Sustainment efforts were continuous meetings, documents and tools, funding, and different plans and work structures. There were often additional actors involved in the collaborations. Information about study design was often not described in a clear and comparative manner. Conclusions There is a need for more research on the details of initiating, executing and sustaining collaborations for health between local authorities and civil society organisations. Knowledge from this scoping review can be used to inform the planning of future collaborations between local authorities and civil society organisations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI